smokinwrench
06-01-2006, 12:15 AM
A Day Without an Illegal Immigrant
An imaginary exercise.
By Tom Tancredo
What would a day without illegal aliens really be like? Let's try to
imagine it.
On May 1, millions of illegal aliens working in meat-processing plants,
construction, restaurants, hotels, and other "jobs Americans won't do"
are supposed to stay home from work to show the importance of their
labor to our nation's economy. Doubtless, there will be some
inconvenience if that happens, but there is another side to the story
that is not being reported.
We are talking about illegal aliens, not mere "immigrants." If legal
immigrants stopped working for a day, we would miss the services of
physicians, nurses, computer programmers, writers, actors, musicians,
entrepreneurs of all stripes, and some airline pilots…as well as the CEO
of Google. That would be more than an inconvenience, but it won't happen
because legal immigrants are not out marching angrily for rights that
are already protected by our courts.
But if illegal aliens all took the day off and were truly invisible for
one day, there would be some plusses along with the mild inconveniences.
Hospital emergency rooms across the southwest would have about
20-percent fewer patients, and there would be 183,000 fewer people in
Colorado without health insurance.
OBGYN wards in Denver would have 24-percent fewer deliveries and Los
Angeles's maternity-ward deliveries would drop by 40 percent and
maternity billings to Medi-Cal would drop by 66 percent.
Youth gangs would see their membership drop by 50 percent in many
states, and in Phoenix, child-molestation cases would drop by 34 percent
and auto theft by 40 percent.
In Durango, Colorado, and the Four Corners area and the surrounding
Indian reservations, the methamphetamine epidemic would slow for one
day, as the 90 percent of that drug now being brought in from Mexico was
held in Albuquerque and Farmington a few hours longer. According to the
sheriff of La Plata County, Colorado, meth is now being brought in by
ordinary illegal aliens as well as professional drug dealers.
If the "Day-Without-an-Immigrant Boycott" had been held a year earlier
on May 8, 2005, and illegal alien Raul Garcia-Gomez had stayed home and
did not work or go to a party that day, Denver police officer Donnie
Young would still be alive and Garcia-Gomez would not be sitting in a
Denver jail awaiting trial.
If the boycott had been held on July 1, 2004, Justin Goodman of
Thornton, Colorado, would still be riding his motorcycle and Roberto
Martinez-Ruiz would not be in prison for killing him and then fleeing
the scene while driving on a suspended license.
If illegal aliens stayed home—in Mexico, Guatemala, Brazil, and 100
other countries—the Border Patrol would have 3,500 fewer apprehensions
(of the 12,000 who try each day).
Colorado taxpayers would save almost $3,000,000 in one day if illegals
do not access any public services, because illegal aliens cost the state
over $1 billion annually according to the best estimates.
Colorado's K-12 school classrooms would have 131,000 fewer students if
illegal aliens and the children of illegals were to stay home, and
Denver high schools' dropout rate would once again approach the national
norm.
Colorado's jails and prisons would have 10-percent fewer inmates, and
Denver and many other towns would not need to build so many new jails to
accommodate the overcrowding.
Our highway patrol and county sheriffs would have about far fewer DUI
arrests and there would be a dramatic decline in rollovers of vanloads
of illegal aliens on I-70 and other highways.
On a Day Without an Illegal Immigrant, thousands of workers and small
contractors in the construction industry across Colorado would have
their jobs back, the jobs given to illegal workers because they work for
lower wages and no benefits. (On the other hand, if labor unions
continue signing up illegal workers, no one will be worrying about Joe
Six-Pack's loss. Sorry, Joe, but you forgot to tell your union business
agent that your job is as important as his is.)
If it fell on a Sunday, Catholic Churches in the southwestern states
might have 20-percent fewer parishioners at Mass if all illegals stayed
home, but they would be back next Sunday, so the bishop's job is not in
danger. The religious leaders who send people to the marches and rallies
will never fear for their jobs, because illegal aliens need their
special "human-rights" advocacy and some priests and nuns seem
especially devoted to that cause. The fact that most Catholics disagree
with the bishops' radicalism doesn't seem to affect their dedication to
undermining the rule of law.
All of this might be a passing colorful episode in the heated national
debate over immigration policy if it weren't for an odd coincidence: The
immigration-enforcement agency responsible for locating and deporting
illegal aliens is also taking the day off today. Of course, they didn't
call it a boycott. It is just (non)business as usual.
—Tom Tancredo is a Republican congressman from Colorado.
An imaginary exercise.
By Tom Tancredo
What would a day without illegal aliens really be like? Let's try to
imagine it.
On May 1, millions of illegal aliens working in meat-processing plants,
construction, restaurants, hotels, and other "jobs Americans won't do"
are supposed to stay home from work to show the importance of their
labor to our nation's economy. Doubtless, there will be some
inconvenience if that happens, but there is another side to the story
that is not being reported.
We are talking about illegal aliens, not mere "immigrants." If legal
immigrants stopped working for a day, we would miss the services of
physicians, nurses, computer programmers, writers, actors, musicians,
entrepreneurs of all stripes, and some airline pilots…as well as the CEO
of Google. That would be more than an inconvenience, but it won't happen
because legal immigrants are not out marching angrily for rights that
are already protected by our courts.
But if illegal aliens all took the day off and were truly invisible for
one day, there would be some plusses along with the mild inconveniences.
Hospital emergency rooms across the southwest would have about
20-percent fewer patients, and there would be 183,000 fewer people in
Colorado without health insurance.
OBGYN wards in Denver would have 24-percent fewer deliveries and Los
Angeles's maternity-ward deliveries would drop by 40 percent and
maternity billings to Medi-Cal would drop by 66 percent.
Youth gangs would see their membership drop by 50 percent in many
states, and in Phoenix, child-molestation cases would drop by 34 percent
and auto theft by 40 percent.
In Durango, Colorado, and the Four Corners area and the surrounding
Indian reservations, the methamphetamine epidemic would slow for one
day, as the 90 percent of that drug now being brought in from Mexico was
held in Albuquerque and Farmington a few hours longer. According to the
sheriff of La Plata County, Colorado, meth is now being brought in by
ordinary illegal aliens as well as professional drug dealers.
If the "Day-Without-an-Immigrant Boycott" had been held a year earlier
on May 8, 2005, and illegal alien Raul Garcia-Gomez had stayed home and
did not work or go to a party that day, Denver police officer Donnie
Young would still be alive and Garcia-Gomez would not be sitting in a
Denver jail awaiting trial.
If the boycott had been held on July 1, 2004, Justin Goodman of
Thornton, Colorado, would still be riding his motorcycle and Roberto
Martinez-Ruiz would not be in prison for killing him and then fleeing
the scene while driving on a suspended license.
If illegal aliens stayed home—in Mexico, Guatemala, Brazil, and 100
other countries—the Border Patrol would have 3,500 fewer apprehensions
(of the 12,000 who try each day).
Colorado taxpayers would save almost $3,000,000 in one day if illegals
do not access any public services, because illegal aliens cost the state
over $1 billion annually according to the best estimates.
Colorado's K-12 school classrooms would have 131,000 fewer students if
illegal aliens and the children of illegals were to stay home, and
Denver high schools' dropout rate would once again approach the national
norm.
Colorado's jails and prisons would have 10-percent fewer inmates, and
Denver and many other towns would not need to build so many new jails to
accommodate the overcrowding.
Our highway patrol and county sheriffs would have about far fewer DUI
arrests and there would be a dramatic decline in rollovers of vanloads
of illegal aliens on I-70 and other highways.
On a Day Without an Illegal Immigrant, thousands of workers and small
contractors in the construction industry across Colorado would have
their jobs back, the jobs given to illegal workers because they work for
lower wages and no benefits. (On the other hand, if labor unions
continue signing up illegal workers, no one will be worrying about Joe
Six-Pack's loss. Sorry, Joe, but you forgot to tell your union business
agent that your job is as important as his is.)
If it fell on a Sunday, Catholic Churches in the southwestern states
might have 20-percent fewer parishioners at Mass if all illegals stayed
home, but they would be back next Sunday, so the bishop's job is not in
danger. The religious leaders who send people to the marches and rallies
will never fear for their jobs, because illegal aliens need their
special "human-rights" advocacy and some priests and nuns seem
especially devoted to that cause. The fact that most Catholics disagree
with the bishops' radicalism doesn't seem to affect their dedication to
undermining the rule of law.
All of this might be a passing colorful episode in the heated national
debate over immigration policy if it weren't for an odd coincidence: The
immigration-enforcement agency responsible for locating and deporting
illegal aliens is also taking the day off today. Of course, they didn't
call it a boycott. It is just (non)business as usual.
—Tom Tancredo is a Republican congressman from Colorado.