PDA

View Full Version : 4 stroke death toll....



300rman
08-28-2008, 11:29 PM
AMA MX season, engine death toll:

1. Chad Reed YZ450F, Daytona
2. Kyle Calderini CRF450R, Edward Jones Dome
3. Austin Stroupe KX250F, Wortham
4. Jason Lawrence YZ250F, Mt. Morris
5. Mike Brown YZ250F, Red Bud
6. Ryan Dungey RMZ250, Red Bud
7. Trey Connard CRF250 (no start) Budds Creek
8. Michael Pugrab KX250F (no start) Budds Creek
9. Martin Davalos 250SXF (exploded 1st moto) Unadilla
10. Broc Tickle YZ250F, Washougal
11. Ryan Clarke CR450F, Washougal



funny, i never remember seeing that many 2 strokes blow up on riders in races over the course of many seasons, much less the same season..........

brapp
08-29-2008, 12:01 AM
yeah thats why i went from the trx450 back to a trx 250r for runnign xc and when they do blow its alott cheaper to fix

3leggeddog
08-29-2008, 10:21 AM
here we go with the 4 stroke bashin.

I built my trx motor last year,3rd race of the season.i rode the piss out of it from then till the 5th race of the season this year.I'm talking many indoors,lots of practice,and a whole season,minus 3 races.Before the 5th race this year we out a new piston,and rings,and honed it.cost me 200 bux.this is a 57.2 hp motor,at the wheels,with 47 ft. lb. tourqe.it's a monster.very reliable.the pro's are obviuosly alot harder on thier machines but I still don't think reliabilty is that bad for the power you get out of these new 4 strokes.

300rman
08-29-2008, 04:47 PM
here we go with the 4 stroke bashin.


not bashing......pointing out a blatant truth. the pro-circuit 2 strokes rarely grenaded.......and thats 11 4 strokes this season i am aware of.........

fabiodriven
08-29-2008, 05:25 PM
:lol: 2 strokes truck- 4 strokes suck!!!!!!!!!:lol:

Just kidding, guys. Although I do like two strokes.

Dirtcrasher
08-29-2008, 06:06 PM
It's got some truth to it.... Those four strokes can be time bombs, but so isn't a built cam'd and stroked 350X or an 85 200X built to the hills. My 86 200X crank isn't gonna last long with the 12:1, cam, race gas, porting and a lightened flywheel.

The new 4strokes need really good maintenance and the valves need to be shimmed correctly.

Were not Ricky Carmichael so I'm thinking that once a year after some good rides that a topend can be done and they can last.

I've got a KXF250F here now, I read the book and found that even the large end of the con rod has a direct oil passage. No more splash system like the old thumpers.

SWIGIN
08-29-2008, 07:39 PM
don't forget, the pro's also used to rebuild there 2 strokes between every run.

i haven't bin in a pro pit since the 2 stroke days but i highly doubt they are tearing into the 4 stroke as much except for normal ajustments.

300rman
08-30-2008, 08:39 PM
don't forget, the pro's also used to rebuild there 2 strokes between every run.


yeah, rings and maybe a piston. that probably takes as long as doing the valves on a 4 stroke :lol:

Billy Golightly
08-30-2008, 09:57 PM
The thing is, with most all of the newer generation 4 strokes, its just a fundamental engineering issue. They have extremely short strokes, and short connecting rods. This makes big hp, but it puts side load on the pistons and the shorter connecting rods actually change how fast the piston accelerates to TDC, and BDC. Because when the engines running, the piston actually briefly "stops" at each one of these points, and the shorter connecting rods make the time from stopped, to moving, even shorter, and thats bad for reliability because it just more or less is on the bleeding edge of flinging itself apart. This a lone is like the single biggest killer of engine reliability, but its also, obviously, a nice way to pickup power too.

Most all of the 2 strokes just are not designed or built with connecting rod ratios as short as the newer generation 450s, so they have the reliability advantage.

300rman
08-31-2008, 01:16 PM
The thing is, with most all of the newer generation 4 strokes, its just a fundamental engineering issue. They have extremely short strokes, and short connecting rods. This makes big hp, but it puts side load on the pistons and the shorter connecting rods actually change how fast the piston accelerates to TDC, and BDC. Because when the engines running, the piston actually briefly "stops" at each one of these points, and the shorter connecting rods make the time from stopped, to moving, even shorter, and thats bad for reliability because it just more or less is on the bleeding edge of flinging itself apart. This a lone is like the single biggest killer of engine reliability, but its also, obviously, a nice way to pickup power too.

Most all of the 2 strokes just are not designed or built with connecting rod ratios as short as the newer generation 450s, so they have the reliability advantage.

Very well said.

but, the short stroke doesnt affect the valve issues. that comes from the engine revving to the moon. i have no doubt these motors would last longer if they were kept out of the upper RPM range most of the time.

The Goat
08-31-2008, 03:16 PM
yeah, but you'd be cruising around at 35. It seems to me that if you had a piston made of titanium...and a cylinder coated with LiquidMetal's high heat application...you could seriously reduce the weight of the piston...of course this would put even more stress on the valves...as coupled with a decent rod kit, this thing would rev and rev and rev.

no way to upgrade the valves? besides springs, keepers, titanium guides, titanium valves?

300rman
08-31-2008, 03:47 PM
titanium valves?

stainless valves are actually a better option for lasting reliability, at least thats the consensus among people on the web.


the REAL problem with the whole valvetrain is that a 4 stroke is inherently heavy because of all the extra parts.

well, to make them lighter to be able to compete with the 2 strokes, they cut WAY down on the sizes and thicknesses of the components, so they are smaller, lighter, and of course, less reliable because they are already on the "edge" of breaking, so to speak.
Now combine that with the short stroke of the crank/rod, and you have a grenade with the pin pulled.

The Goat
08-31-2008, 11:07 PM
I was thinking chromoly as I typed that actually. But even still...the difference in weight between a 250r and a 450r engine can't be that damned much. can it?

KASEY
08-31-2008, 11:37 PM
HOW DO YOU GET LONGIVITY OUT OF THIS????
http://www.rickramsey.net/CRF250Xlg/Piston.jpg

SCEADU
08-31-2008, 11:48 PM
Where did the rest of the piston go on these new machines? I watched a friend build one in his shop and the way those pistons are, you would think they could turn sideways in the cylinder.

300rman
09-01-2008, 01:42 AM
I was thinking chromoly as I typed that actually. But even still...the difference in weight between a 250r and a 450r engine can't be that damned much. can it?

thats because they have cut down on the sizes of parts to make them lighter, sacrificing reliability for weight loss. and even after all that R&D, the 250R motor is still lighter.

The Goat
09-01-2008, 03:28 AM
well i was thinking of the difference in weight between the 350x and the 300r...honestly it's maybe 10-15 pounds.

lol...kasey that piston is amusing. I'm sure it could be made to be reliable though, nothing like the old honda aircooled motors...but still.

WaimakRydah
09-01-2008, 05:24 AM
This is why my last bikes have all been air cooled low maintanance 4 strokes

brapp
09-01-2008, 11:48 PM
its nto that its the fact that they are pullign every ounce of reliable performance and if the new 4 strokes are maintained properly they will last but they are much higher strung than the older thumpers of yesterday. but its allpersonal preferance but i have started a revolution her elocaly with goign back to the 2 strokers.

3leggeddog
09-02-2008, 10:35 AM
well type what you will,believe what you want.i've had em both.My 250r's got rebuilt 3-4 times a season.i've rebuilt my 450r once in that time span.never lost a bit of performance,or puffed any smoke.a 4 stroke can be reliable.

Tri-Z 250
09-02-2008, 11:24 AM
To even compaire your stock motor to Chad Reeds motor is well:lol: . Yeah is isn't the iron horse XR 400 motor of yester year, neither is the power, that you rode till the valves were cooked. I welcome the new 4stroke..my 01' 426 has a ton of miles and other than the valve check it has needed nothing. If the motor needed to be freshened I couldn't tell. I don't ride like a pro and I don't run it down the road wide open at all. I think I've topped it out one time and hit the rev limiter once in a swapping wipeout. I'll rebuild it eventually but I'm biding time. Due to the price I may just go big bore with an Athena or Ice Cube block. Bigger is better right?

brapp
09-02-2008, 11:55 AM
well i run my 450's liek a 2 stroke wound tight and on the rev limiter constantly and was rebuilfing th3e 450's abotu 3-4 times a season. and i have gernaded my 05 450r on mor ethan one occasion. i ble wup my first 2 stroke in abotu 10 years over the weekend but thats because i grabed the wrong gas can and had the timing adbvanced toofar on the drag bike its a whole diffrent story.

300rman
09-02-2008, 10:42 PM
like i said earlier. i have no doubt these motors will last if you are nice to them.
but its obvious they simply CANNOT stand up to major abuse and high-rpms like a 2 stroke can.

brapp
09-02-2008, 11:04 PM
its nto really that its allabotu simlicity your comparign 20 year old 2 stroke tecnolegy to modern 4 stroke tech now if you compare modern 2 stroke tech liek the 03's and newer its pretty damn close pound for pound of relibility.

300rman
09-02-2008, 11:34 PM
its nto really that its allabotu simlicity your comparign 20 year old 2 stroke tecnolegy to modern 4 stroke tech now if you compare modern 2 stroke tech liek the 03's and newer its pretty damn close pound for pound of relibility.

02 was when honda switched to the new motor design. too bad they didnt stick with it and get the bugs worked out of it, it would have been a formidable motor.

but i havent heard that they were any more reliable than the previous design.

too bad they didnt put as much R+D into the 2 stroke motors period. they were pretty much unchanged from the time they went to waterpumpers till 02. Obviously, much more power than a modded 250 dirtbike is useless anywhere but sand/drags or if you are a really big guy. i am talking R+D into getting wider, smoother powerbands without sacrificing that high-end scream. if they did that, the 2 stroke motors would still be "IN"

my lil ol 250 has WAY more power than my buddies 450. but his is more prone to power-wheelies and is usually faster in a drag.
BUT, his doesnt mar up the ground, where mine leaves a 2 inch deep trench every time i touch the throttle because the power hammers down.

On the road, with street tires, the two fiddy would win every time. but those knobbies dont hold traction even on the road...we tried....shifting second or third hard makes a wheel spinning-slide sideways, scary problem where his holds the road and just goes.