Big Red 250ES or 200ES?

[patblkwell]

I'm just curious for those who have ridden both as to which one you all prefer? I have owned a 250ES but have never had or ridden a 200ES. I know the 250ES has a larger motor, rear suspension, etc..but other than that, is it really that much better than the 200ES? How do they compare as far as riding comfort, size, and all? thanks

[dougspcs]

200es is good..but the hard tail is a bit rough unless you stick with the OEM style balloon tires to suck up the bumps. I kinda like the reverse being on the handle, not down near the shifter on the transmission, Hi/Lo range on the 200es was never an issue for me..could have done without it..

If comparing them on a scale, 250es being a 10 out of 10..I would give the 200es an 8 out of 10.

[tri again]

Going from one to the other is always a treat.
The 200 is a monster in the mud and superunstable terrain
because you know exACTly where your tail is relative to the ground.

In other words, all 3 of us rolled our first rear suspension trike because of the extra flex.
I mean, it was instant over the run we make every day.

For a long day of work or long ride, the 250 models usually get chosen.
Love 'em both.

[patblkwell]

Yeah I'd have to agree that having the rear suspension would def. be a plus compared to not having it at all. I would think that for most typical riding, you would want to leave the 200ES in high as opposed to low.