View Full Version : Big red 200 motor upgrades?
MN250R
01-04-2019, 11:54 AM
Looking for some ideas to bump the performance a little on my 200. I know I won't be making power out of her like a 250 but was seeing if anyone has done anything to there's? I here an xr 200 cam??200x cam?? 200x carb?? I already did the 200m front end upgrade on mine. :)
Thanks!
Gabriel
01-04-2019, 12:29 PM
Exhaust will help a lot. Not many options so you’ll have to find a used set up or start fabricating.
The exhaust is pretty small and restrictive.
Do a compression test. If it’s low, rebuild. The 200 doesn’t have overly thick cylinder walls so boring for displacement is a waste of time. Only bore to get a good piston fit.
If you’re inside a 10.5:1 compression piston will help a lot but I wouldn’t go higher.
If you’re handy enough, a little attention and love to the ports will help a lot. Don’t bother trying to get a real port and polish job, just clean things up and remove all the casting flash. It’s amazing how much casting flash some heads have in the exhaust port.
A good valve job after that.
PROPERLY jetted and tuned carburetor makes a world of difference. Can’t guide you there. I’m still in the infancy stages of learning that.
Also don’t forget the little things that may not do anything by themselves but compound together to make issues.
But a quality air filter. Don’t adjust the carb without it.
Clean the centrifugal oil filter.
Inspect the pulse rotor advance springs. PS2Fixer can sell you brand new ones. If they’re weak the advance will be off and performance will suffer.
Set the timing with a light and be sure the pulse rotor gap is in spec.
Good luck!!
shortline10
01-04-2019, 12:34 PM
Motor needs to breathe more to make more power . The factory x and r cams are not noticeable upgrades but good as a factory replacement only IMO .
A minimum of a mid grind Web cam , high compression 10.25 wiseco piston , 26mm xr200 carburetor and a performance exhaust will wake that little motor up .
MN250R
01-04-2019, 01:24 PM
Awesome! Thanks for all the advice. I will do a compression test on her and see where I'm at with that first, Then go from there about the other areas to check.
It runs good, but if I snap the throttle fast it bogs, especially in high gears. I'm assuming it's lean. It just cuts out. Air filter is new, everything cleaned and no air leaks around the cylinder and manifold. I also cleaned the carb. Its probably the cheap Ebay carb rebuild jets I got. Lol
ps2fixer
01-04-2019, 02:59 PM
I haven't seen it done yet, but wouldn't a 200x cylinder/head be a direct swap to up the compression to 9.6:1 vs the 200ES having 7.8:1. Of course if you go with new piston etc I guess sticking with the stock cylinder etc would be best? Not super ontop of the 200ES/S/M head vs the 200X head flow wise etc, but stock to stock the 200x is the highest outputing of the 200 series that I'm aware of, atleast in the 3 wheeler models.
Based on the service manuals, the 200ES is 13hp while the 200X is 18hp.
350for350
01-04-2019, 10:00 PM
The difference is mostly in the higher compression and bigger cam on the 200X.
Gabriel
01-05-2019, 08:45 AM
Cooling fins are bigger too.
MN250R
01-05-2019, 10:53 AM
Would something like these work?
https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fulk%2Fitm%2F38 1903701199
https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fulk%2Fitm%2F33 2776359979
10.25 compression? Or is that to much? The stock compression is 7.8?
That piston is for a 200. Would that be the best piston to go with? Or a 200x / xr 200? Thanks!
350for350
01-05-2019, 10:35 PM
Cooling fins are bigger too.
I was only talking about the difference in power. Of course you're right about the cooling fins.
350for350
01-05-2019, 10:42 PM
Would something like these work?
https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fulk%2Fitm%2F38 1903701199
https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fulk%2Fitm%2F33 2776359979
10.25 compression? Or is that to much? The stock compression is 7.8?
That piston is for a 200. Would that be the best piston to go with? Or a 200x / xr 200? Thanks!
Either of those two listed pistons should work. A 200 top end is basically a 200 top end. The 200X just has a higher stock compression ratio than the other 200's do. I'm not up as much on the XR200, but I think it's the same. Now the differences would come with the 86/87 200X style of engines. They are completely different. As for the XR, as long as it's a two valve engine, I think it should be the same (I'm not sure if the XR200 ever went to four valve or not).
ps2fixer
01-05-2019, 10:57 PM
Yes the XR200 had a 4 valve version, it was similar in design as the 350x head, I can't remember if each valve port for exhaust was separated or not, but it runs dual carbs. Might have been a 250cc XR engine, can't recall for sure, but I have one. It's a "progressive" dual carb setup, a primary, and after around 1/2 throttle the secondary starts opening, kind of like a 4 barrel carb on old car engines.
EDIT: Yea, the dual carb setup was the XR230 & XR250R according to wiki. It also says the XR200R engine was modeled after the XR250R engine (RFVC engine) in 84-85, I suspect those years the parts might not interchange over since they are similar/based on the 4 valve engine.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_XR_series#XR_200R
MN250R
01-07-2019, 03:08 PM
Thanks for all the replies. I'm thinking I might go with the 10.25.1 piston. I'm sure its quite bit more noticeable over the 9.5 one. Does anyone know if the xr200 cam is a low end torque cam? Or should I just keep the factory one I have if its within specs.
MN250R
01-11-2019, 09:18 PM
Exhaust will help a lot. Not many options so you’ll have to find a used set up or start fabricating.
The exhaust is pretty small and restrictive.
Do a compression test. If it’s low, rebuild. The 200 doesn’t have overly thick cylinder walls so boring for displacement is a waste of time. Only bore to get a good piston fit.
If you’re inside a 10.5:1 compression piston will help a lot but I wouldn’t go higher.
If you’re handy enough, a little attention and love to the ports will help a lot. Don’t bother trying to get a real port and polish job, just clean things up and remove all the casting flash. It’s amazing how much casting flash some heads have in the exhaust port.
A good valve job after that.
PROPERLY jetted and tuned carburetor makes a world of difference. Can’t guide you there. I’m still in the infancy stages of learning that.
Also don’t forget the little things that may not do anything by themselves but compound together to make issues.
But a quality air filter. Don’t adjust the carb without it.
Clean the centrifugal oil filter.
Inspect the pulse rotor advance springs. PS2Fixer can sell you brand new ones. If they’re weak the advance will be off and performance will suffer.
Set the timing with a light and be sure the pulse rotor gap is in spec.
Good luck!!
Thanks for the advice. Wll i tested the compression tonight and had about 100 psi. It still runs fine and starts easy which is kind of wierd if the compression is that low. I know it lacks in the power department unless your in low range. I will do a little porting as you mentioned to clean up the ports some. And upgrade the carb and do some plug chops for jetting.
Gabriel
01-11-2019, 09:51 PM
That’s not uncommon at all to run at that pressure.
I had one running at 70psi before I overhauled it.
ps2fixer
01-11-2019, 10:16 PM
Yea 100psi is low, but not so low it won't run. I tried to find a spec, but I guess biggs engines don't have a PSI rating because it requires special equipment, so they say flywheel kick back is their compression test. Anyway here's a random thread of a guy at 60psi with a running engine and it seems like all the replies are like ignore the compression it's normal. Those briggs engines are only like 6.5:1 compression ratio lol.
https://www.smokstak.com/forum/showthread.php?t=151221
MN250R
01-12-2019, 10:41 AM
Yea 100psi is low, but not so low it won't run. I tried to find a spec, but I guess biggs engines don't have a PSI rating because it requires special equipment, so they say flywheel kick back is their compression test. Anyway here's a random thread of a guy at 60psi with a running engine and it seems like all the replies are like ignore the compression it's normal. Those briggs engines are only like 6.5:1 compression ratio lol.
https://www.smokstak.com/forum/showthread.php?t=151221
Thanks! I will check it out :)
MN250R
01-12-2019, 10:44 AM
I just bought an OTC cylinder leak down tester. It should help me pin point the problem even better. But most likely i will upgrade to a wiseco 10.25.1 piston and an xr200 cam.
Gabriel
01-12-2019, 10:45 AM
I wish someone made a TRUE big bore cylinder for the 200 engine. Wouldn't be that big a deal to set the case halves (together) in a bridgeport and bore it to accept a larger sleeve. They do it to VW air cooled engines all the time.
Gabriel
01-12-2019, 12:01 PM
Can we hang out ........later Gabe.........Gabe
Said it once before but it bears repeating; You are one different colored duck brother.
MN250R
01-13-2019, 06:56 PM
I see the XR 200 cams say midrange. Would installing that take away from the low end torque on the 200es with the stock cam? Since im going with the 10.25.1 Wiseco piston
Also, If i were to go with an XR200 cam, would i need to replace the camshaft bushing and thrust washer if mine are still in good shape? Sorry for all the questions :)
Scootertrash
01-13-2019, 07:18 PM
I put an XR200 Cam and carb on my 200S and it woke it up nicely. I also added a SuperTrapp exhaust that took many hours of searching and waiting on ebay to find, still needs to be fine tuned after I saw a tuning sheet from Supertrapp for the XR200, I need to add some discs and rejet. My buddies with stock 185's and 200's can't touch me ;)
I really doubt you'll lose much on the low end, at least not enough to worry about. You have a hi/lo gear range correct? if so, I wouldn't worry about it.
350for350
01-13-2019, 10:00 PM
I also think that the higher compression piston will help with bottom end torque too.
ps2fixer
01-13-2019, 10:05 PM
Of my understanding, higher compression is basically making the piston engine more mechanically efficient, but I can't remember what the negative trade-off was. This was more in a sense of car engines, but high compression is great for take offs mpg wise, but horrible for light cruising, low compression is slower take offs but better overall mpg. Pretty sure higher compression increases power overall so even with a higher rpm tuned cam, upping the compression can offset the low end losses.
MN250R
01-14-2019, 07:13 AM
Awesome thanks for the help everyone!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.