Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 32

Thread: BBL's 82 250R update ... she is a runner! New pictures!

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    100mi west of Chicago
    --
    3,582
    That thing is looking good

    Rob

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Lewiston, N.Y.
    --
    1,477
    siiiiiiiiiiiiick bike. Love how its all origional looking then you got them custom meaty tires. Awesome look to it!

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    CUYAHOGA FALLS, OHIO
    --
    1,242
    Great job Maggiesboy on saving another trike and bringing it back to life. You did a most excellent job!
    3-85 ATC 70
    86 ATC 250R
    86 WETBIKE
    01 KX250
    2011 KAW SXR800- 35YR EDITION
    05 HERITAGE/SPRINGER/SOFTTAIL

  4. #19
    edog's Avatar
    edog is offline I'm like an Original Gangsta...but a post whore instead. The day begins with 3WW
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    New Hampshire
    --
    6,629
    I would upgrade to the first gen 200X front end. You would have one sick looking trike!!!!!

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    oregon
    --
    2,292
    Quote Originally Posted by fabiodriven View Post
    I disagree. I think the first gen R's need to keep their big balloon front tire. To me that is the calling card of the first gen R.
    did he not throw that idea out window when he upgraded the rear wheels and tires? Theirs a difference from looks and performance. The front tire is almost the same as a atc185s.
    Last edited by factoryX; 10-02-2009 at 07:30 PM.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Internet
    --
    1,251
    Quote Originally Posted by factoryX View Post
    did he not throw that idea out window when he upgraded the rear wheels and tires? Theirs a difference from looks and performance and handling. the front tire is almost the same as a atc185s.
    Exactly. I laugh at the people who moan about 'keep the front fatty on there' but neglect aftermarket pipe, aftermarket rear wheels, hub and tires.

    And it's not as if the person will take the front fatty and throw it away - the option is there to revert it back to original if need be.

    The simple reality is - a front fatty sucks. So does the stock forks. If you want it to be trail worthy and turn 'good' then just bolt on a 200x front. Better suspension and much better looks.

    Honda went to a narrow front tire for a reason in 83' - because it works much better. The 1st gen platform needs a better front (IE:200x) AND a longer swingarm if you want them to really 'perform' up to standards with anything made after 83 ...

    Throw a 300 in there with a 200x front and a +3 or +4 swingarm and you have a trike that will compete with anything else. Keep it 'stock' and it will quickly become apparent why the suspension and engine changes were made in later years.

    p.s. - I dunno how your cousin will like those Holeshots ... they have a crapload of sidebite, not all that fun for sliding. I had Razr's on my 300R and it was good for rough trails - but the turf tamers on it now are much better for 'trike' purposes.

  7. #22
    fabiodriven's Avatar
    fabiodriven is offline Aspiring romance novel cover model, and the Official 3WW slayer of thieves and swindlers. Catch me if you can
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The woods
    --
    10,516
    I don't know why people dislike the front fatty so much. I run with the stock size "fatty" on my 85 Tecate and it handles just fine. To each their own I guess.
    85 Tri-Zinger 60
    85 ATC250SX
    86 ATC250SX
    87 ATC250SX
    02 XR650L conversion
    84 ATC 480R

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Internet
    --
    1,251
    Quote Originally Posted by fabiodriven View Post
    I don't know why people dislike the front fatty so much. I run with the stock size "fatty" on my 85 Tecate and it handles just fine. To each their own I guess.
    'handles just fine' - that statement sums it up perfectly. I thought the fat tire on mine 'handled just fine' too, & maybe it did - but - I can tell you the narrow tire handles MUCH better. The 200x forks are much smoother.

    Think about it - if a fat front tire handled better & was a better choice then a narrow front would Honda have changed to a narrow front in 83?

    They key to getting the 1st gen R 'up to snuff' with later models is the front end swap and a longer swingarm.

    If 'just fine' is good enough for a 1st gen owner, leave it be. Personally I prefer the looks & performance advantages the 200x swap gives my 1st gen.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Marysville, WA
    --
    4

    holeshots & 200x front end

    You know 20/20 hindsight the holeshot hds prolly not the best idea but i will work with them till the time's right, and there is always time for the 200 front end conversion, @least thats my 2 cents on that

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Internet
    --
    1,251
    Quote Originally Posted by brownbaglunch View Post
    You know 20/20 hindsight the holeshot hds prolly not the best idea but i will work with them till the time's right,
    Wear em down on pavement.

    and there is always time for the 200 front end conversion, @least thats my 2 cents on that
    For sure! Looks damn good as it sits.


  11. #26
    85Tecate is offline At The Back Of The Pack Arm chair racerAt the back of the pack
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Iowa
    --
    442
    I dont get the whole concept of a skinnier tire either, although i do want to change just to "try" it. Im running the stocker on the front of my t3 and i have absolutley to problems turning. If i need to turn quick i just pin the throttle

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    oregon
    --
    2,292
    also want to point out the tecate 84-85 tire is 10 times better than the 81-82 air fooler tire. the tire used on the air foolers where complete junk. another reason to upgrade from stock rims,w my dads 81 atc250r had stock tires and rims and it was buzzing the hell out of him so he took off the stock tires in the rear and the wheels were bolted together wrong from factory. The left side was sitting half an inch higher than the right.
    Last edited by factoryX; 10-03-2009 at 03:12 AM.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    conesus lake NY
    --
    11,894
    Blog Entries
    1
    hey the crank is in backwards..ha that thing is gonna wheelie like no other with them tires.. careful!

  14. #29
    edog's Avatar
    edog is offline I'm like an Original Gangsta...but a post whore instead. The day begins with 3WW
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    New Hampshire
    --
    6,629
    Quote Originally Posted by Saul View Post
    'handles just fine' - that statement sums it up perfectly. I thought the fat tire on mine 'handled just fine' too, & maybe it did - but - I can tell you the narrow tire handles MUCH better. The 200x forks are much smoother.

    Think about it - if a fat front tire handled better & was a better choice then a narrow front would Honda have changed to a narrow front in 83?

    They key to getting the 1st gen R 'up to snuff' with later models is the front end swap and a longer swingarm.

    If 'just fine' is good enough for a 1st gen owner, leave it be. Personally I prefer the looks & performance advantages the 200x swap gives my 1st gen.

    You forgot the single most important upgrade to the trike....... The suspension needs to be addressed.


    We need some video of that girl up and running!!!!!

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Internet
    --
    1,251
    Quote Originally Posted by edog View Post
    You forgot the single most important upgrade to the trike....... The suspension needs to be addressed.

    Did you even read what I wrote?

//ArrowChat Integreation Code //