Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 90

Thread: Having some fun with the National Product Safety Commission…

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Chesterfield, Virginia
    --
    845

    Having some fun with the National Product Safety Commission…

    On a rainy dreary day, I had to find something to do, so I figured why not spend some quality time conversing with the CPSC.... I'm sure its all been asked before but I had some time to pass...

    To: Topka, Tanya
    Subject: Mandatoy standards for ATV: Final ruling inquiry

    Ms. Topka,

    Upon review of certain portions of the CPSC website I have found references pertaining to a “Mandatory Safety Standard” for the introduction/production/distribution of three wheeled ATV’s. However I was unable to find any information on where this standard is located or the date which it is scheduled to be published. As a long time three wheeled ATV enthusiast, collector and restorer it puzzles and concerns me that the temporary restriction on the importation/distribution of such vehicles may in fact in essence be an actual attempt to place a permanent ban on the vehicles through the use of a standard that is not scheduled/intended to be authored.

    I am certainly aware of the series of events starting in the mid 1980’s that led to the original agreement to suspend the importation of the vehicles by the agreeing parties (i.e. Honda, Kawasaki, Yamaha, Polaris etc.) for a period of ten years. These events included a great increase in ownership of the vehicles over a short period of time, resulting in many unskilled riders being injured. Many of these injuries have been directly associated with rider error or a misunderstanding of the correct practices required to operate the machines. Many more were simply due to the lack of proper safety gear or being under the influence of alcohol or drugs. I myself have been riding these vehicles since the early 1980’s and have as have many others, watched their numbers wither to the brink of extinction, in fact I actually own more three wheelers than I have seen in person (others than mine) in the past two years. Parts are becoming an issue and many of the existing three wheelers are being literally ridden “until their wheels fall off”. Why you might ask? Because people love them, they are certainly not for everybody, but for the trained and skilled rider their handling characteristics are second to none, their weight is much lower than their four wheeled cousins, their maintenance costs are lower, and because of the placement of the third wheel, they tend to cause less rutting to trails than their four wheeled counterparts potentially making them environmentally friendly, its a win/win situation… A potential improvement to the economy through sales of new vehicles, the potential for a safe off road alternative to four wheelers, the potential for less destruction of the environment thereby allowing more trail systems and additional increases in revenue related to the trail systems and the licensing of the ATV’s.

    You may be asking yourself… “Who in their right mind would buy a three wheeler?” well Ms. Topka It’s no secret that three wheelers have suffered the wrath of the media and ridicule over the past twenty five years, but with an unbiased study into ATV related injuries and deaths, I and many others would be surprised if you findings reveal anything greater than rider error or lack of proper safety gear in the majority of the cases and to answer your question… I would certainly buy a few new ones, as my current “Trikes” are all in excess of twenty five years old…

    Regardless of your opinion of three wheeled ATV’s please reply with your intentions in reguard to the established standards.

    Rodd Hoffman



    From: Topka, Tanya
    Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 7:05 AM
    To: Rodd Hoffman
    Cc: Jirgl, Justin
    Subject: RE: Mandatoy standards for ATV: Final ruling inquiry

    Thank you for your inquiry. Part 1420.4 of the CPSA states, “Until a mandatory consumer product safety standard applicable to three-wheel ATVs promulgated pursuant to the CPSC is in effect, new three-wheel ATVs may not be imported into or distributed in commerce in the United States.” This language came straight from Congress when they passed the CPSIA. There are no plans at this time to issue a mandatory standard and the ban remains in effect.

    Tanya Topka, Compliance Team Lead (Fast Track and Mechanical Hazards)
    U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
    301-504-7594 Fax: 301-504-0359
    Use our online form for reporting under Section 15: https://www.cpsc.gov/cgibin/sec15.aspx
    For Recall Info: http://www.cpsc.gov/businfo/corrective.html


    From: Rodd Hoffman
    Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 8:06 AM
    To: Topka, Tanya
    Cc: Jirgl, Justin
    Subject: RE: Mandatoy standards for ATV: Final ruling inquiry

    Ms. Topka,

    Please explain in detail how the commission feels that they are in compliance? If as you stated, and I quote “There are no plans at this time to issue a mandatory standard” when the language approved and handed down by congress clearly states that a standard is required. Is the commission above the confines of the Constitution of the United States whereas they choose to enforce portions of a particular ruling, while making no plans to comply with other portions of the same ruling. This sounds as if it could be directly compared to the former handgun ban in Washington DC whereas guns were effectively banned unless you secured an unattainable permit. Are you familiar with the determined constitutionality of the Supreme Court’s ruling associated with this historical ruling which bears a disturbingly similar resemblance to the commission’s refusal to provide a standard. Perhaps you are not yet aware of the progress related to the authoring of the standard; if that is the case could you kindly provide me with the contact information of the person or persons assigned to the creation of this mandated standard?

    Sincerely,

    Rodd Hoffman


    From: Topka, Tanya [mailto:TTopka@cpsc.gov]
    Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 8:59 AM
    To: Rodd Hoffman
    Cc: Jirgl, Justin
    Subject: RE: Mandatoy standards for ATV: Final ruling inquiry

    There is no requirement to develop such a standard. The ban went into effect immediately after Congress passed the legislation so obviously they felt strongly that a ban was needed. Additionally, the three-wheel ATVs have been banned from manufacture, import, or distribution with the legacy manufacturers since the Consent Decree. The Office of Compliance has enforced this since the agreement went into effect.

    Tanya Topka, Compliance Team Lead (Fast Track and Mechanical Hazards)
    U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
    301-504-7594 Fax: 301-504-0359
    Use our online form for reporting under Section 15: https://www.cpsc.gov/cgibin/sec15.aspx
    For Recall Info: http://www.cpsc.gov/businfo/corrective.html


    Ms. Topka,
    The “Consent Decree” was in force for a period of ten years (i.e. 1988 thru 1998) it was clearly not a ban but more of a generic “Plea Bargin” if you will by the legacy manufacturers to eliminate the possibility of a “Blanket Recall” which is what the CPSC was pushing for at the time. Obviously the damage that the press as well as misinformed individuals have done to the reputation of the three wheeled ATV will likely prevent the legacy manufacturers from ever marketing another three wheeled ATV in this country, however there continues to be a niche market for those that prefer three wheeled ATV’s over the more popular and cumbersome four wheeled variety.
    You state that there was an obvious need for the most recent ban and that congress felt it was necessary to address the safety concerns associated with three wheeled ATV’s, with all due respect, it seems apparent that it was also a need for a “Mandatory Standard” as the requirement was included in the exact legislation which you are referring to. Furthermore it’s a fact that there have been no new commercially produced / distributed three wheeled ATV’s in this country for over twenty two years, yet congress saw fit to require the existence of a “Mandatory Standard”, therefore a standard must be brought into existence as government related agencies are bound by law to abide by the rules and regulations set forth by congress just as individuals, private businesses and corporations are, or does the CPSC feel that they are exempt from the bindings of law set forth by congress?
    Please provide any and all information which you have available to justify both the moratorium on the sale of new commercially produced three wheeled ATV’s (required via the freedom of information act) as well as any documentation that exempts the CPSC from following the letter of the laws set forth by congress.
    In addition, please forward any studies that have been completed that provide the effects that current safety programs designed for the currently produced ATV’s and how they would have affected the safety concerns associated with three wheeled ATV’s prior to the consent decree when no such safety programs were in place. As an American citizen it’s very important to me that restrictions on items such as three wheeled ATV’s are based on fact, rather than remnants of theories sparked from exaggerated reports on popular television news magazines which aired nearly a quarter of a century ago.

    Sincerely,
    Rodd Hoffman


    You will need to submit a request through our Freedom of Information Office for the specific information you requested. Their number is 301-504-7923 or you can do it online or by email cpsc-os@cpsc.gov.

    The Consent Decree led into the Voluntary Letters of Undertaking (which are now referred to as Action Plans) and those agreements were only with legacy manufacturers/distributors prior to the CPSIA legislation and mandatory standard. The ban now applies to all 3-wheel ATVs regardless of who manufactures, imports, or distributes the product, so it addresses ATVs made, imported, or distributed by firms that did not have Voluntary Letters of Undertaking (banning all 3-wheel ATVs not just certain firm’s ATVs).

    Tanya Topka, Compliance Team Lead (Fast Track and Mechanical Hazards)
    U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
    301-504-7594 Fax: 301-504-0359
    Use our online form for reporting under Section 15: https://www.cpsc.gov/cgibin/sec15.aspx
    For Recall Info: http://www.cpsc.gov/businfo/corrective.html


    From: Rodd Hoffman
    Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 1:59 PM
    To: Topka, Tanya
    Cc: Jirgl, Justin
    Subject: RE: Mandatoy standards for ATV: Final ruling inquiry


    Ms. Topka,

    As stated in the referenced legislation:

    “3. Three-Wheel ATVs

    The CPSIA also addresses 3-wheel ATVs. It provides that until the
    Commission issues a consumer product safety standard applicable to 3-
    wheel ATVs (and the standard goes into effect) ``new 3-wheeled all
    terrain vehicles may not be imported into or distributed in commerce in
    the United States.'' CPSA Sec. 42(c), as added by CPSIA Sec. 232.
    Violation of this restriction is a prohibited act under section
    19(a)(1) of the CPSA.”

    Please read the second sentence thoroughly, that constitutes a moratorium (i.e. temporary hold or ban) until the what is referred to as the “Commission” which is implied as “The Consumer Product Safety Commission” issues a “Safety Standard”. Please provide the scheduled release date of this document or series of documents which the legislation clearly requires your commission to produce. By not producing the referenced standard the commission is not in compliance with the legislation, and in turn makes it impossible for any individual or firm to fully comply with the legislation. Are you stating that the commission has no intent to comply by issuing a “Safety Standard” for three wheeled ATV’s? Would the commission be willing to enact a written standard authored by a third party?

    Rodd Hoffman


    As stated previously, you will need to contact the FOIA Office for specific information you request.

    Tanya Topka, Compliance Team Lead (Fast Track and Mechanical Hazards)
    U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
    301-504-7594 Fax: 301-504-0359
    Use our online form for reporting under Section 15: https://www.cpsc.gov/cgibin/sec15.aspx
    For Recall Info: http://www.cpsc.gov/businfo/corrective.html

    Ms. Topka,

    You clearly stated that I would have to pursue a different route to request information through the “Freedom of Information Act” and I fully understand that. However you have not given me a direct answer, as to when the scheduled date is for the release of the “Safety Standards” pertaining to three wheeled ATV’s. I have written you because I was advised that you were in charge of this portion of the department. If I need to contact another individual due to the fact that you are not willing or permitted to answer the question pertaining to the release date of the “Safety Standards” for three wheeled ATV’s please give me their contact information and I will gladly pursue that information from the correct individual as well.

    Sincerely,


    Rodd Hoffman

    .......................

    And with that note I hit a dead end
    TRIKE INTERESTS
    A1/A2 TECATE's

    BIKE INTERESTS
    ATK, Husqvarna, Maico, Harley Davidson & Yamaha Twins

    PLEASE KEEP AN EYE OUT FOR THE FOLLOWING STOLEN 3/30/2012

    1999 ATK 260LQ ENG# 425681 Red/White/Blue VIN# 4MAV1CC43XA009376 (Its the last one missing out of four the first three were destroyed)

    My Feedback

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Alaska
    --
    9
    Great read. Keep up the good work.

  3. #3
    tundrawillie is offline Check my feedback before buying from me First time rider
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Jemison, AL
    --
    207
    Screw the elitist politicians and their lapdogs. I'll build my own trikes.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Crest California
    --
    3,014
    Keep it up. Who knows, you might just annoy them enough..
    LED obsessed
    2015 Yamaha FJ-09

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Saint Louis, MO
    --
    22
    It seems Ms. Topka works inside of this lil box and these challenging questions are making her have to think outside of her comfortable lil box, therefore send any future related queries to this black hole below.

    Geez what a headache…what she needs is about 16,000 emails about this topic
    84 250R
    84 125M (2)

  6. #6
    ATCrider42 is offline At The Back Of The Pack Arm chair racerFirst time rider
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Iowa
    --
    227
    I'll email her. I think we all should. Requesting that they write up some safety standard or at least acknowledge that they should do something to address the issue.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Saint Louis, MO
    --
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by ATCrider42 View Post
    I'll email her. I think we all should. Requesting that they write up some safety standard or at least acknowledge that they should do something to address the issue.
    I agree and would be happy to.
    84 250R
    84 125M (2)

  8. #8
    Mosh is offline I'm the one with all the 2 stroke around here! The day begins with 3WW
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    na
    --
    5,702
    Proabably gave that 26 year old college intern a splitting migrane, just before she clocked out, and hit the rush hour traffic jam..

    All while she was nestled away in her worlds safest automobile, Volvo, driving perfectly safe, while texting on her cellphone..
    Here is where my long useless list of stuff nobody cares about should go...


    Proudly NOT a member of

    "Team on the Teat"

  9. #9
    dksix's Avatar
    dksix is offline Just Too Addicted Arm chair racerJust too addicted
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    North East Tennessee, USA
    --
    610
    I don't understand how it went from the companies listed to all companies? Going by what she is saying it would be illegal to import some of the Russian built trikes I've seen pics of, is that correct? No one can buy of sale any brand of NEW 3 wheeled ATV in the US? How does the company that's selling the new road trikes get by with it? Is it just because there aren't ATV's but built for the street? In that case then someone could build a new trike, make it street legal like a dual sport bike and since it's not an ATV it would be legal, right?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    here
    --
    1,336
    HuffieVA, I greatly respect you and am honored to be a three-wheeler owner with you. Thank you. -Robby.
    83' 200x (son's). 85' 200 auto-x & 85' 125m (daughters). 84' Tecate(?). 85' KXT Tecate (mine!, mine!, mine!.)+ some others but don't feel like typing them in.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Buffalo
    --
    808
    man I wish I had your writing skills. great read I must say
    Tpc 450
    86 250r
    86 350x
    86 200x
    86 250sx
    85 225DR
    (2) 84 YTM
    (3) 85 Atc 70

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Moab, UT
    --
    1,807
    Once again your linguistic skills and logic impress me, Rodd. I couldn't think of a better man for the job of hassling the CPSC. Keep up the good work. Who knows, you just might get somewhere with this.
    ADMIRIN' BOOBS AND BLASTIN' NEWBS

  13. #13
    TommyBoy1971's Avatar
    TommyBoy1971 is offline At The Back Of The Pack Arm chair racerFirst time rider
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Quinton, VA, United States
    --
    161
    I would tell her you contacted the foia guys, and they directed you to contact her for the answer. It is another example of how the associations and personnel that are run by taxpayer money, feel they have no duty or obligation to answer questions pertaining to their job by anyone other than their higher..

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Chesterfield, Virginia
    --
    845

    A few more emails...to follow up

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Topka, Tanya [mailto:TTopka@cpsc.gov]
    Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 6:51 PM
    To: Rodd Hoffman
    Cc: Jirgl, Justin
    Subject: RE: Mandatoy standards for ATV: Final ruling inquiry

    I told you in my first email response that there is no plan at this time to issue a mandatory performance standard for 3-wheel ATVs.

    Tanya Topka, Compliance Fast Track Team Lead
    U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
    301-504-7594 Fax: 301-504-0359
    www.cpsc.gov www.atvsafety.gov

    Ms. Topka,
    I understand what you stated, I am simply asking, or in simpler terms demanding an answer in regard to who specifically made the decision to not comply with the CPSIA legislation as approved by congress? I believe that this action is in blatant violation of the CPSIA as approved by congress. Its obvious that those who approved (congress) the measure felt it was necessary to include a provision in the legislation for a “Mandatory Standard”. I feel as a citizen of the United States its my right to be informed precisely why the decision to ignore the requirement of the standard was made as well as the names and positions of who made the decision to disregard the duties assigned to the CPSC by congress.

    The blatant disregard to the provisions that were approved by congress and signed into law is inexcusable. For a government entity to disregard the rule of law set forth by our elected officials undermines the very foundation of a democracy. Perhaps manufactures can choose to ignore their responsibilities and thumb their noses at the CPSC with no consequence as well, wouldn’t that be nice, can you imagine a world with Lawn Darts, Tag-Free mattresses, and box after box of Preparation H that didn’t contain a warning to remind us not to eat it? Sounds a bit silly doesn’t it? Of course it does, but not unlike the CPSC’s decision to refuse to issue a “Safety Standard” which it is obligated to produce. After all I would assume that the main concern of an agency known as “The Consumer Product Safety Commission” would be related to “Safety”, yet the CPSC is (per your comments) refusing to issue a “Safety Standard” which it has been mandated to produce.

    Once again as part of my duty as an American Citizen I am obligated to ask, when the CPSC plans to release the “Mandatory Safety Standard” related to three wheeled ATV’s as mandated by congress?

    Your expedited response will be greatly appreciated,

    Rodd Hoffman


    Which recieved an automated response of:
    I am out of the office. I will respond to all emails when I return on Monday.

    TO BE CONTINUED...
    TRIKE INTERESTS
    A1/A2 TECATE's

    BIKE INTERESTS
    ATK, Husqvarna, Maico, Harley Davidson & Yamaha Twins

    PLEASE KEEP AN EYE OUT FOR THE FOLLOWING STOLEN 3/30/2012

    1999 ATK 260LQ ENG# 425681 Red/White/Blue VIN# 4MAV1CC43XA009376 (Its the last one missing out of four the first three were destroyed)

    My Feedback

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    SLC, UT
    --
    16
    Hats off to what you're doing! You're definitely making her earn her tax dollar supported salary!

//ArrowChat Integreation Code //