Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 51

Thread: they say 3 wheelers suck ???

  1. #1

    they say 3 wheelers suck ???

    http://trainwreck.proboards14.com/ this one guy said that 3 wheelers suck.

    Blasterboy
    3-wheelers suck
    ATCManny250r
    haha lmao 3 wheelers are a hundred times better then 4 they handle better they climb hills better, they are a lot lighter then 4 wheelers. The only reason why you say they suck is because you dont have the skills to ride 3 wheelers. 4 wheelers are so easy to ride.
    3 WHEELERS FOREVER!
    Manny

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    --
    83
    way to go manny now just keep telling him about them i can say without a doubt that 3 wheelers climb better i climb a hill with ease on my trike

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    New Hampshire
    --
    794
    But the sad truth is, quads are better. A preference is one thing, but fact is fact. Sure, you can be faster on a trike, but your working twice as hard and you need to have that much more skill and endurance. Quads are the better machines for the masses.

    That being said, this guy is a retard (in my opinion of course). I owned one quad and that mistake wont be made again (unless its a race machine of some sort)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Cortland, NY
    --
    1,195
    People say 3-wheelers suck most of the time because they have never ridden one and are basing their opinion on what they've heard. Do quads suck? No way! My bro's piped 03 blaster and my 400ex are a ton of fun to ride. Being the only one in your riding group on a mint trike is something special though. I love going to poker runs and larger rides and being different by having my tri z. It turns heads everytime. Woods riding is fun on trikes because they can turn tighter than quads so snaking your way through the trees is easier.
    http://photos.yahoo.com/dynofox250 (TF 03 pic's)

    Trikes: Restored '86 ATC 250r, original and mint '83 185s

    Quad: '86 TRX 250r

    Sled: Rev X 800ho mod

    Bike: '00 ZRX 1100

    TF '03 and '05 Survivor

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Spanaway, WA
    --
    1,248
    i know quads have a stoppie advantage i get to watch a guy from down the road do 5th gear wheelies and big stoppies on an LRD piped 400ex
    Hoarder of the finest junk

    '82 YT175
    '83 YTM200
    '85 KLT110
    '86 Moto 4 225
    '84 TRX200 trike conversion.
    '87 Tecate 4
    Lots of vintage and not so vintage two wheeled stuff.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    --
    946
    HEY! manny, put what i posted up too! i made a good point.. im YamaBLaster..
    06 TRX450r , 85 ATC250r, 01 TRX300ex, 84 ATC110
    88 Mustang GT

  7. #7
    i forgot what u said and i cant find it anymore.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    --
    946
    Its still on there :o
    06 TRX450r , 85 ATC250r, 01 TRX300ex, 84 ATC110
    88 Mustang GT

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    --
    946
    http://trainwreck.proboards14.com/index.cgi?board=OP&action=display&num=1064166883&s tart=0

    Here is the whole story. Lol..

    Manny-It seems like everybody likes blasters on this site. Why a blaster? Blasters stink.
    BlasterBoy-well bbp does make blaster products and the owners both have blasters and bbp stands for Blaster Brothers Performance
    Manny-oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
    YamaBlaster(Me.)-Why not blasters?? And why Dorky looking 82 250rs??
    Manny-1982 250r are a hundred times better then blasters faster, quicker, handle better, lighter, jump better.
    Manny
    Sand-Hey train isn't one of the rules not to diss blasters?
    Me-Why yes, It is! do i smell a Ban?? He was banned of 3ww too..lol..
    [/quote]
    06 TRX450r , 85 ATC250r, 01 TRX300ex, 84 ATC110
    88 Mustang GT

  10. #10
    Honda300ex you said blasters were light then my 82 250r i told you blasters were heavier they weigh 324 lbs. http://yamaha-motor.com/products/unitspecs.asp?lid=1&lc=atv&cid=1&mid=47

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    --
    946
    But how much does trailprotrailpro R wiegh??
    06 TRX450r , 85 ATC250r, 01 TRX300ex, 84 ATC110
    88 Mustang GT

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    New Hampshire
    --
    794
    Its really too bad your 100% wrong manny. The blaster handles better then the 82 R, has comparable power, is more reliable, jumps better, etc etc etc. Stop shooting off on things you know nothing about.

    Now if it were an 83 R, you could make a much stronger argument, and probably make yourself look knowledgeable.

  13. #13
    Ok you proved nothing there johnny blaze until I see a blaster out handle a 82 250r then you have proven somethin so keep your mouth shut until you do prove it. And the blaster's do not have comparable power is not even close i can smoke blasters all night long in the woods and drags.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    New Hampshire
    --
    794
    Okay. I had a 82 250r. They suck. I'v ridden many blasters. I have much more riding experience then you, and my opinion is not biased...

    Also, did i mention half the trailprotrailprotrailprotrailpro you say is so completey flawed in both its truth and its embeleshment, that you make yourself look retarded?

  15. #15
    JB i raced a few blasters and smoked them and i just started riding 5 months ago and these guyz have been riding for a few years and i eat them alive and there older then me also.

//ArrowChat Integreation Code //