Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Mud Busters vs. RAZR

  1. #1
    toyota200x's Avatar
    toyota200x is offline At The Back Of The Pack Arm chair racerAt the back of the pack
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    --
    402

    Mud Busters vs. RAZR

    I have mud busters on the back of my '85 250sx and I love the traction they give it, but I was wonder how a razar's would work as rear tires. I mostly ride trails with some mud, and in the winter about a foot of snow. Will the razar's get as good of traction compared to a set of mud busters?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    --
    21
    I just ordered a set of Razr 2's... For my 250R, I'll let you know when i get them on what i think...

    Got them for 145 shipped to my door...

    But i am going from 10 year old dunlops, so i am sure its going to be a huge improvement..
    ATC 250R

  3. #3
    Psyonyde is offline At The Back Of The Pack Arm chair racerFirst time rider
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    --
    157
    If u ride mud then you will NOT want Razr's. My freind had them on his tri-moto, and he said whenever he would go in mud he would get stuck....
    Just what I heard
    1983 Honda 200e
    1984 Honda 200es (needs rebuild)
    1985 Honda 250es
    1986 Honda 250es (parts bike)
    1984 Honda 200es (parts bike)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Northeast
    --
    17,493
    I have run a set of Bandits XC's on my 85 250 SX for well over 4 years. I don't ride everyday but I have put MANY miles on this trike - they still have 80% tread and claw there way through any terrain out there including the best of mud. You can't compare any tire from an SX to a 250R as the SX has very little wheel spin. I wouldn't hesitate to buy them again - 225$ on Douglas .190 rims to my door and they seem indestructable.

//ArrowChat Integreation Code //