Well, from the tone you used here joking about it you pretty much supported it.
The smiley was for the "non-toxic feces" comment in the linked article. Did you read it? Where in my OP did I say anything about approving of what was done?
Apparently you missed this part of my post:
If it indeed does turn out to be an actual gun owner, I will be one of the first to criticize their actions, but not until it's proven it was a gun owner.
Yea, I have guns, but I dont support idiots and I dont like people making me look like an idiot because I'm in the same group as them.
They have yet to prove it was an actual gun owner, so you are assuming it was and claiming that whoever sent it is propagating a "gun supporters stereotype". Where did you get this stereotype? Do you really believe that is the picture of a stereotypical gun supporter? The gun owners I know and hang around don't do this type of thing. Do the ones you know do it?
No, I dont support them posting the info in the paper either.
Good. I would hope so, since you are a gun owner
If you cant handle a little criticism
Where in your post did you criticize me? I see you criticizing whomever sent the poo, but not me. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Real mature way to deal with it, congrats to that idiot for propogating a gun supporter`s stereotype. And since im assuming this happened in NY, id like to give the sender a nice F U for wasting more of my money for a bomb squad to inspect his log. Hopefully he gets caught and has to pay for it all, thats how it worked when a kid at my high school sent a fake anthrax threat in.
I suggest you quit trolling with all these gun posts
Trolling? This is an open forum. The majority of the gun posts I make are to keep my fellow trikers, gun owners, and hunters informed of the current developments with all of the gun control crap being thrown our way (including your state), since it appears to be important to others on this forum, at least judging by the "likes" and "thanks", and positive posts by other members to a large number of my gun control related posts. My guess is it's because we are all outdoorsmen in more ways then one. I've also made posts offering up my sponsorship for a 700.00 discount for those who may want to save money if they join the NRA to help support gun owners rights and the 2nd Amendment
and blowing a gasket when somone questions you.
You never questioned me in your first post and I never blew a gasket in my reply. I merely questioned your assumptions and your rather disrespectful stereotype of a gun supporter. A little sensitive aren't we?
This is my last post in these threads, no sense arguing with people over the internet who re unable to take criticism.
I take criticism quite well, actually. I've edited posts that were misinterpreted by others here and made apologies to others on this forum who have misinterpreted or misread some of my comments.
You may want to look in the mirror when you talk about those unable to take criticism, since I criticized your:
assumption that it was an actual gun owner when there was/is no proof of such
assumption that I approved of this incident by misreading my post
lame generalization that the person who did this was "propagating the gun supporter stereotype"
little rant about your tax dollars being wasted (see below)"investigating a log" as you so eloquently put it. (How do you know it wasn't a DQ swirl?)
You sure seem to be the one blowing a gasket after I criticized your comments
Originally Posted by fabiodriven
Reply With Quote
), someone published the names and addresses of the employees of the Journal News. The newspaper requested extra police patrols around the homes of the employees whose names and addresses where published. Big tough guys until they are in the same boat. How's that for wasting your tax dollars? Do the published gun owners get the same consideration? Or would that be wasting your tax dollars too?
