Hello
You already said you looked it up yourself in the manual, see the quote below, plus I gave it to you in post #26. Read my post if you want the info quickly.
Below is the spec from the manual you claimed you looked up. There is no thickness spec for the metal plates only a “warpage” spec. Your metal plates are most likely not worn by more than .001 but in your case this is irrelevant since your new clutch assy is positively as thick as, or thicker than an OEM one according to the friction disc spec provided in the manual combined with the “known” typical wear encountered in the metal discs . I’m pretty sure my posts contain all the spec info you need to know but I could be wrong.
Manual clutch friction disc spec, new =.103-.109, service limit .091
Xxxxx
That would be helpful but not necessary. I told you how to EASILY tell if your centrifugal shoes are most likely OEM or not in post #27.
xxxxx
That info along with the online manual and page number for it is in post #27.
xxxxx
One should easily be able to extrapolate that from the information I provided in posts #26 and #27.
My answer is no, others may vary.
xxxxx
Providing the discs fit on the hub and left enough room for the pressure plate to fully disengage and still have it’s splines penetrated by the inner hub by approximately .100” [get out your calculator it’s your turn now] it would at the very least increase the preload of your previous springs to a point where the amount of force required to manipulate the shifter would be substantially increased which might damage the shift shaft [unlikely] and the additional preload may also cause the springs to coil bind during activation [this would need to be calculated] which could limit the amount of movement in the shifter to a degree where it could not shift gears.
Xxxxx
Well, I for one would feel more like I was helping if you did not ask questions that were already answered in my posts.



Reply With Quote