Page 10 of 15 FirstFirst ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... LastLast
Results 136 to 150 of 224

Thread: 1984 ATC300R Fooler build

  1. #136
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Mexico
    --
    9,018
    Quote Originally Posted by barnett468 View Post
    In reality, you could put a 72 mm carb on it and set the throttle so it only opens 1/2 way which will make it a 36 mm carb. Doing this, will in general, cause it to perform like a 36 mm carb at the same throttle slide openings but not necessarily at the same throttle position on the bars unless it is set up to do so.
    A little 6th grade math for the Kawasaki engineer… The surface area of the throat of a 36mm carburetor is 1017.87mm. The area of a 72mm carburetor is 4,071.50mm. Therefore it would stand to reason that if one were to open said 72mm carburetor half way that it would offer a surface area of 2,035.75mm, or an area equivalent to that of a wide open 50mm carburetor, would it not?

    Quote Originally Posted by barnett468 View Post
    In general, the bottom line is, if you get a 38, 39 or 40 mm etc., and think it’s too big, just don’t open the throttle all the way and you will in effect have a smaller carb.
    I should add to this that when a carburetor is too large for a specific engine it won’t create enough negative pressure in the throat of the carburetor to allow fuel to come up from the bowl, creating a lean condition. To try and operate a vehicle with an abnormally oversized carburetor by only opening it partially as this poster seems to be suggesting would be asinine.
    Last edited by El Camexican; 01-06-2014 at 04:48 PM. Reason: Because I can

  2. #137
    barnett468 is offline FACT ! I have no edit button Arm chair racerThe day begins with 3WW
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    minnesota
    --
    5,911
    Hello bigdaddyvw185;


    I hope your holidays were good.


    A small group of people “attempt” to berate me at every opportunity they get for making posts that they consider overly lengthy and/or overly detailed. Unfortunately, you might see more of those types of posts on your thread. My previous post was just a general example to give you a little info on carbs since you were asking for info on them. I wanted to keep it fairly simple and therefore simply felt no need to clutter up a page with calculations like PI X R2 and E = MC2 etc..


    My comment about a 72 mm carb in effect becoming a 36 mm carb if opened only half way was merely intended to be a general example and not an exact number. Since imo, one person seems to be unhappy with my generalization, in the interest of accuracy, I will supply a much more accurate estimate for the size which is 50.92 mm, not a 50.0 mm as stated by another or the 72 mm size stated by me.


    I calculated the 50.92 number in my head, therefore, unfortunately, it still might be off by around .0001 mm or so either way. The member that seemed to take exception to my post might voluntarily calculate the number to its final digit for you.




    Quote Originally Posted by El Camexican View Post
    To try and operate a vehicle with an abnormally oversized carburetor by only opening it partially as this poster seems to be suggesting would be asinine.
    I never suggested that anyone do this as a matter of common practice. Imo, as this particular person occasionally does, they are "attempting" to twist my comments around and make unwarranted abrasive comments to, or about me, simply to serve their own agenda.




    The quote posted below is inaccurate due to what imo, is its ambiguousness which is “created” by its lack of detailed information.

    Quote Originally Posted by El Camexican View Post
    I should add to this that when a carburetor is too large for a specific engine it won’t create enough negative pressure in the throat of the carburetor to allow fuel to come up from the bowl, creating a lean condition.
    My interpretation of said quote, is that the author is suggesting/implying that running a carburetor that is too “big” for a given engine will cause it to go so lean that one’s engine might become damaged. Since this is not necessarily the case, imo, for the benefit of at least this person, it appears that another brief physics lesson is required.


    Since as I previously mentioned, I feel it is unnecessary to fill the page with a bunch of numbers, I will once again simplify and generalize my comments.


    There are several ways to say the following, I have only mentioned a few.


    All carburetors need to be PROPERLY jetted irregardless of their size. For all intents and purposes any carburetor can be jetted to avoid a dangerously lean condition, it’s simple physics. I should also hope that it is unnecessary to say that a 70 mm carburetor is too big for a 250 cc engine.


    When a carb is too “big” for an engine, it will, in general, have no adverse effect on idle. This is because the throttle is closed and one can typically set it to flow exactly the same amount of air as a smaller carb at this speed.


    A large carburetor will only affect performance differently than a smaller carb once its throttle slide/butterfly etc. is opened to a point where its area [the amount of air it is capable of flowing] is greater than the maximum area of a given smaller carb when its throttle slide/butterfly etc. is opened to its limit. This is one of the points I was trying to express in my previous post.


    To determine/calculate what the optimal size carb for ones engine is, one of the factors they would need to know is the volumetric efficiency of their particular engine.




    PS – Bigdaddyvw185, although, my understanding of your question is that you are not looking for info on how pressure waves, elevation, air density and humidity, etc. affect carburetion, I apologize for not posting this info for those that might have had an interest in it. Perhaps the author of the quotes above would like to accurately explain their effects in detail if they are able to.

  3. #138
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Mexico
    --
    9,018
    Quote Originally Posted by barnett468 View Post
    Hello bigdaddyvw185;


    I hope your holidays were good.


    A small group of people “attempt” to berate me at every opportunity they get for making posts that they consider overly lengthy and/or overly detailed. Unfortunately, you might see more of those types of posts on your thread. My previous post was just a general example to give you a little info on carbs since you were asking for info on them. I wanted to keep it fairly simple and therefore simply felt no need to clutter up a page with calculations like PI X R2 and E = MC2 etc..


    My comment about a 72 mm carb in effect becoming a 36 mm carb if opened only half way was merely intended to be a general example and not an exact number. Since imo, one person seems to be unhappy with my generalization, in the interest of accuracy, I will supply a much more accurate estimate for the size which is 50.92 mm, not a 50.0 mm as stated by another or the 72 mm size stated by me.


    I calculated the 50.92 number in my head, therefore, unfortunately, it still might be off by around .0001 mm or so either way. The member that seemed to take exception to my post might voluntarily calculate the number to its final digit for you.




    I never suggested that anyone do this as a matter of common practice. Imo, as this particular person occasionally does, they are "attempting" to twist my comments around and make unwarranted abrasive comments to, or about me, simply to serve their own agenda.




    The quote posted below is inaccurate due to what imo, is its ambiguousness which is “created” by its lack of detailed information.



    My interpretation of said quote, is that the author is suggesting/implying that running a carburetor that is too “big” for a given engine will cause it to go so lean that one’s engine might become damaged. Since this is not necessarily the case, imo, for the benefit of at least this person, it appears that another brief physics lesson is required.


    Since as I previously mentioned, I feel it is unnecessary to fill the page with a bunch of numbers, I will once again simplify and generalize my comments.


    There are several ways to say the following, I have only mentioned a few.


    All carburetors need to be PROPERLY jetted irregardless of their size. For all intents and purposes any carburetor can be jetted to avoid a dangerously lean condition, it’s simple physics. I should also hope that it is unnecessary to say that a 70 mm carburetor is too big for a 250 cc engine.


    When a carb is too “big” for an engine, it will, in general, have no adverse effect on idle. This is because the throttle is closed and one can typically set it to flow exactly the same amount of air as a smaller carb at this speed.


    A large carburetor will only affect performance differently than a smaller carb once its throttle slide/butterfly etc. is opened to a point where its area [the amount of air it is capable of flowing] is greater than the maximum area of a given smaller carb when its throttle slide/butterfly etc. is opened to its limit. This is one of the points I was trying to express in my previous post.


    To determine/calculate what the optimal size carb for ones engine is, one of the factors they would need to know is the volumetric efficiency of their particular engine.




    PS – Bigdaddyvw185, although, my understanding of your question is that you are not looking for info on how pressure waves, elevation, air density and humidity, etc. affect carburetion, I apologize for not posting this info for those that might have had an interest in it. Perhaps the author of the quotes above would like to accurately explain their effects in detail if they are able to.
    If you are going to make absolute statements like “in reality” and “it will” and then use examples that are almost 100% off the mark then perhaps you should consider using model verbs to allow for the gross miscalculations in your comments.

    As far as belittling, or berating your posts need I remind you of how many times you have defended your erroneous posts with claims of being an “engineer”, or “dealing only in facts”? If you’re going to come on here and sing a song at least learn the words before you ask others to clap and dance and to it.


    Bigdaddy, sorry to have messed up your thread. I'm sure your 38mm will work great.

  4. #139
    bigdaddyvw185's Avatar
    bigdaddyvw185 is offline At The Back Of The Pack Arm chair racerAt the back of the pack
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Seymour CT
    --
    314
    It is what it is guys, tho we all should just get along here, sometimes it just does not work out like that lol.

    On a different note,
    reading back over the previous posts about the PWK carb swap, id like to see if any more information could be brought up about what Daddio said about the throttle cable having clearance issues with the down tube of the frame. the information i was able to dig up involved people cutting holes into the frame and then intern running the throttle cable down threw the main tube of the frame and out right above the carb.
    then the second solution to this clearance problem was to install something like this,
    http://www.jetsrus.com/individual_parts/007_731_su.html
    according to jetsRus this 90 degree bend will fit on all Keihin and Mikuni carburetor caps, here is another link that give a little bit more info, its at the bottom of the page. http://www.jetsrus.com/carburetor/ca...PJ_series.html

    can anyone who has dealt with this chime in and give some info on how the clearance issue turned out for you? thanks

  5. #140
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    STL
    --
    3,560
    These are what i run, they have the bend in them already. i believe they clear the frame on the foolers, i was always close with mine it was a royal PITA to the the top of the carb off to pull the slide so I could clock the carb to check out the pilot and main jets. http://www.ebay.com/itm/Motion-Pro-T...-/201004240566
    TrikeFest 07,08,09,10,11,12,13,14 SandPuppie's Ride 07,08,09 Imperial Invasion 09, 13

  6. #141
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    STL
    --
    3,560
    01-0604 part number for that motion pro throttle cable incase you want to do some shopping around.
    TrikeFest 07,08,09,10,11,12,13,14 SandPuppie's Ride 07,08,09 Imperial Invasion 09, 13

  7. #142
    barnett468 is offline FACT ! I have no edit button Arm chair racerThe day begins with 3WW
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    minnesota
    --
    5,911
    Hello bigdaddyvw185;



    You can also call Sudco to see if they have anything.

    http://www.sudco.com/CatalogPDF.html




    Post 137.
    Quote Originally Posted by barnett468 View Post
    A small group of people “attempt” to berate me at every opportunity they get for making posts that they consider overly lengthy and/or overly detailed. Unfortunately, you might see more of those types of posts on your thread.
    Post 138.
    Quote Originally Posted by El Camexican View Post
    If you are going to make absolute statements like “in reality” and “it will” and then use examples that are almost 100% off the mark then perhaps you should consider using model verbs to allow for the gross miscalculations in your comments.

    As far as belittling, or berating your posts need I remind you of how many times you have defended your erroneous posts with claims of being an “engineer”, or “dealing only in facts”? If you’re going to come on here and sing a song at least learn the words before you ask others to clap and dance and to it.
    Looks like I was right.





    Imo, the above person, has at the very least, done the following things on your thread:


    Made unwarranted, abrasive comments, to and about me, even after the quote below was posted on another thread by one of the sites overseers a few weeks ago which they must have seen since they posted on the same thread just before and after it.

    Billy was also thanked by the following members for his post quoted below, kebby28, dougspcs, hatc200x1, and manbearpig.

    Quote Originally Posted by Billy Golightly View Post
    Guys, easy up here a bit. Mr. barnett strikes me as the odd type a bit, for sure, and I don't see any serious name calling or denigrating stuff here in this thread technically, but does it make a good impression for other people reading it?
    Obviously hijacked your thread to use for his own agenda.

    Obviously tried to twist my words to make it look like I am wrong and they are right.

    Obviously make inaccurate [erroneous] statements as evidenced by their posts on your thread.

    Obviously complained about my posts but refuses to use the sites “ignore” button for some unknown reason.

    Disrupted your thread.




    Imo they also frequently won't stop making these types of negative posts until they feel like they have the upper hand and had the last word, just watch.

    Imo they also appear to become agitated when I am thanked by others for my posts, which happens frequently, just put my name in the search engine and see.




    Below are just 2 pm’s I received in the last week from other members. I removed the names of the senders so people like the one above cannot badger and berate them for saying what they think.

    Hey Barnett468,

    I just wanted to send a PM and say thanks for your information in my thread about "…………….". I liked your info and am taking your advice as much as possible.

    I'm just sending this because I was reading on another thread and saw some very negative comments towards you and feel that they were a bit out of line.

    I just wanted to say thank you. I hope you have a very nice Christmas!

    Hey how's it going barnett.

    I just wanted to thank you for all the help and advice you have given the community at 3ww.

    I know i have been missing from this site and have focused on other areas of my life, but I really hope to get back into the sport as soon as time permits.

    Once again thank you for everything. Your words are much appreciated.





    Quote Originally Posted by El Camexican View Post
    If you’re going to come on here and sing a song at least learn the words before you ask others to clap and dance and to it.
    I don’t have a clue what this means, lol.

  8. #143
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Mexico
    --
    9,018
    Sorry Bigdaddy, we have to share the forums with people that have, well, let’s just call them issues. I won’t respond to the babble above and mess your thread up anymore, but I can’t promise the same of others.

    Or the babble 3 posts below...
    Last edited by El Camexican; 01-08-2014 at 12:07 AM. Reason: Because I have a button that can edit

  9. #144
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Kentucky
    --
    511
    Quote Originally Posted by bigdaddyvw185 View Post
    It is what it is guys, tho we all should just get along here, sometimes it just does not work out like that lol.

    On a different note,
    reading back over the previous posts about the PWK carb swap, id like to see if any more information could be brought up about what Daddio said about the throttle cable having clearance issues with the down tube of the frame. the information i was able to dig up involved people cutting holes into the frame and then intern running the throttle cable down threw the main tube of the frame and out right above the carb.
    then the second solution to this clearance problem was to install something like this,
    http://www.jetsrus.com/individual_parts/007_731_su.html
    according to jetsRus this 90 degree bend will fit on all Keihin and Mikuni carburetor caps, here is another link that give a little bit more info, its at the bottom of the page. http://www.jetsrus.com/carburetor/ca...PJ_series.html

    can anyone who has dealt with this chime in and give some info on how the clearance issue turned out for you? thanks
    I run a 39 pwk similar to Hartley's 300r on my 84 and had no problems with the cable interfering with the down tube and binding but I can see where it could be a problem. The top of the carb is right under the tube.

  10. #145
    bigdaddyvw185's Avatar
    bigdaddyvw185 is offline At The Back Of The Pack Arm chair racerAt the back of the pack
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Seymour CT
    --
    314
    I am not here to start drama, or any other nonsense.... That being said....I welcome any help / suggestions that i can get... Especially with this build god knows i could use it, I new nothing of 2 strokes back when this build first started and i would not have it in its current condition without the help of the fellow members on these boards....without a doubt...iv learned everything i no on the subject from these forums!... now without kicking dirt on Anyone's feet... can we please keep this kinda stuff to a minimum. i have kept my nose out of the drama for good reason, As this is not what we should be here for. We are all here for the love of our trikes.

    lol i dont no how else to say it... So with that being said lets just keep it civil and keep it to the point of helping each other out...

  11. #146
    barnett468 is offline FACT ! I have no edit button Arm chair racerThe day begins with 3WW
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    minnesota
    --
    5,911
    Hello bigdaddyvw185;


    I sent you a private message.



    Post 137.
    Quote Originally Posted by barnett468 View Post
    A small group of people “attempt” to berate me at every opportunity they get for making posts that they consider overly lengthy and/or overly detailed. Unfortunately, you might see more of those types of posts on your thread.
    Post 142.
    Quote Originally Posted by barnett468 View Post
    Imo they also frequently won't stop making these types of negative posts until they feel like they have the upper hand and had the last word, just watch.
    Post 143.
    Quote Originally Posted by El Camexican View Post
    Sorry Bigdaddy, we have to share the forums with people that have, well, let’s just call them issues. I won’t respond to the babble above and mess your thread up anymore, but I can’t promise the same of others.
    Imo, he is hijacking your thread once again by making even more unwarranted, abrasive comments about me in a post where imo, he is attempting to disguise his intent by making an artificial apology for previously hijacking your thread to use for his own agenda to make abrasive comments to me. He then says that I “have issues”...? lol.

    I rest my case.

  12. #147
    bigdaddyvw185's Avatar
    bigdaddyvw185 is offline At The Back Of The Pack Arm chair racerAt the back of the pack
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Seymour CT
    --
    314
    Quote Originally Posted by stroberts22 View Post
    I run a 39 pwk similar to Hartley's 300r on my 84 and had no problems with the cable interfering with the down tube and binding but I can see where it could be a problem. The top of the carb is right under the tube.
    thank you for chiming in man, i was actually looking up your thread over on foolers for your 300 build this afternoon and saw the post where you mention'd you didnt have to drill the hole like 1upfront had too and you were able to sneak it right on in, Hopefully i will run into the same luck! lol.

  13. #148
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Wherever I May Roam
    --
    3,757
    The three wheeler build that you started this thread to showcase is looking really good bigdaddyvdub. Excellent work!

  14. #149
    barnett468 is offline FACT ! I have no edit button Arm chair racerThe day begins with 3WW
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    minnesota
    --
    5,911
    Quote Originally Posted by bigdaddyvw185 View Post
    I welcome any help / suggestions that i can get... Especially with this build god knows i could use it, I new nothing of 2 strokes back when this build first started and i would not have it in its current condition without the help of the fellow members on these boards. ...So with that being said lets just keep it civil and keep it to the point of helping each other out.
    Hi bigdaddyvw185;

    Did you get or ask about 2 stage reeds for it?

  15. #150
    bigdaddyvw185's Avatar
    bigdaddyvw185 is offline At The Back Of The Pack Arm chair racerAt the back of the pack
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Seymour CT
    --
    314
    I have yet to get a set of reeds, i am still shopping around. still need to get in touch with mossbarger, have to call them one of these days, i found a phone number for them from the foolers website, so i will be giving that a shot. Also from what i understand they still make the bolt on metal intakes with the rubber in whatever size is needed, so thats a even bigger plus.

    found a post on foolers with the info regarding the subject so i was like yep i need to give them a call.

//ArrowChat Integreation Code //