The beta versions of Vista seemed a bit clunky, but everybody I know running a release version of Vista loves it so far. I'm not sure where you get your info that most servers run Linux, but out of the hundreds of places I've been over the years, it's been about 95% MS, 4.5% Novell, and about .5% Linux. I know of 2 places that tried to move to a Linux server environment because of all the hype, and both switched back to MS for various reasons. If Linux is such a better option, why isn't it more compatible with the millions of software packages out there? I mean, there are thousands of Linux programmers compared to the small MS camp, right? Don't get me wrong, it seems that Linux has come a long way, but there's still quite a bit of refinement to be done for them to be the "best option".Originally Posted by xd 200x