Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 51

Thread: Yamaha Banshee 2008

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Columbus, Georgia-Mid Dixie
    --
    5,301
    Quote Originally Posted by 84honda200s View Post
    you know how many "wannabe" riders would hurt/kill them selves.
    Good, thin out the herd some.

    85 Tri-Z's
    85 Quad-Z,
    85 YT175 For sale,
    83 YTM 225DX,
    83 YTM 200L For sale,
    82 Tri-Zinger 60 For sale,
    8? YTZ 80 Conversion,
    85 YT 125,
    89 Pro Hauler 230,
    05 YFZ 450,
    99 V-Star,

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    western ny
    --
    3,366
    Quote Originally Posted by LonesomeTriZ View Post
    Good, thin out the herd some.


    i kinda thought someone would say something like that. i agree with it 100%.
    down to parts because i no longer have a place to ride trikes.

    GIT IT RAAAGGGGG !!!!

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    saratoga, ny
    --
    2,819
    theres 2 banshees sitting on the showroom floor right now up at my local yamaha dealership, and sitting right next to them, are two blaster. both are 07 models, going for full price. the guy i talked to said the two strokes are done, four stroke is the wave they are riding now, but they can still sell off the remaining quantity of the banshee and blaster that yamaha has. he did say to me and i quote his words..."there is absolutely no reason for yamaha to replace the banshee or the blaster with the wide variety of raptors and the yfz450. they have the market covered from utility, to sport, to racing, he doubts we will ever see another bike like the banshee or the blaster again." now im not saying hes a know it all, or hes right about this, but pretty discouraging words coming from a yamaha man.
    1985 KXT 250 Tecate - kx cylinder, kx ignition, bassani headpipe, answer silencer, v-force reeds, 38mm airstyker carb, +2 franks swinger, raptor rear shock.

    1996 YSF240 Blaster - maxxed out!!!

    Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "HOLY SH-T, what a ride!"

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Lipetsk, Russia
    --
    2,824
    Quote Originally Posted by My trike Sucks View Post
    that would be a waste, the phazer is a slow ass pos,,, the banshee's here are just re-badged, some new LE red plastic, still the same thing from 92,
    Yes, the Phazer isn't LIGHTNING FAST, but it's a 500cc FOUR-STROKE in a heavy (500+ lbs) sled chassis with a CVT tranny. Think of it in a light (~300) quad chassis, with a 6 speed manual? Ever hear of "power to weight" ratio?

    And yeah, the Banshee there is just a re-badged copy of the '92 Banshee. EVERY BANSHEE except the j-arm ones they made in '87 are a re-badged copy of the previous one, they haven't changed a single thing on them in 20 freakin' years.
    I'm back in the USSR...

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Ab Canada
    --
    4,368
    Quote Originally Posted by RedRider_AK View Post
    Yes, the Phazer isn't LIGHTNING FAST, but it's a 500cc FOUR-STROKE in a heavy (500+ lbs) sled chassis with a CVT tranny. Think of it in a light (~300) quad chassis, with a 6 speed manual? Ever hear of "power to weight" ratio?

    And yeah, the Banshee there is just a re-badged copy of the '92 Banshee. EVERY BANSHEE except the j-arm ones they made in '87 are a re-badged copy of the previous one, they haven't changed a single thing on them in 20 freakin' years.
    Dude, i work with the things day in and day out, dont preach me on power to weight, 90% of the phazers weight is in the motor itself, theres litertally nothing to the sled, it would still be way to heavy for a quad chassie, hell look at how heavy the banshee still is and its a 350 twin 2 stroke, not to mention, the EFI system on them Blow's goats, theres a reason they only ever put 1 twin in sport quad,
    1985 Tri-Z-

    Quote Originally Posted by mywifeknowseverything
    Just hit the Freakin Gas and Hold on!!!!!

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Moab, UT
    --
    1,807
    Quote Originally Posted by 84honda200s View Post
    they wont ever put a 80 plus hp engine in a quad and let the consumer buy it. you know how many "wannabe" riders would hurt/kill them selves.
    ha hah hah! so true
    ADMIRIN' BOOBS AND BLASTIN' NEWBS

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    western ny
    --
    3,366
    Quote Originally Posted by My trike Sucks View Post
    Dude, i work with the things day in and day out, dont preach me on power to weight, 90% of the phazers weight is in the motor itself, theres litertally nothing to the sled, it would still be way to heavy for a quad chassie, hell look at how heavy the banshee still is and its a 350 twin 2 stroke, not to mention, the EFI system on them Blow's goats, theres a reason they only ever put 1 twin in sport quad,

    agreed for the most part. ive owned about 8 or so sleds the track is probably one of if not the heaviest things on a sled. i only owned 1 yammie sled. it was a snappy little thing for only being a 250. but pretty much i cant comment on yammie sleds at all. i dont know about the phazer engines but the rotax engines and the invader engine i own now only weighed on avg. 70 pounds.


    i do know a rotax wouldnt be to bad in a trike/quad. hell dale put one (i believe a 670 rotax) in his e.t. bike.

    but as i said none of it even matters because they will never ever put a sled engine or a engine as powerful in a quad. but it doesnt mean we cant.
    down to parts because i no longer have a place to ride trikes.

    GIT IT RAAAGGGGG !!!!

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Jones, Michigan
    --
    1,821
    there was a write up about the "2008 banshee 500" in the april 07 dirtwheels. I have it right here but when i scan it its too big to post up.


    Hey i figured it out, here ya go
    Last edited by dizasterzrfun69; 09-05-2007 at 01:31 AM.
    "Instruction manuals are nothing more than another man's opinion."
    - Chick McGee




    -1985 250sx
    - 1986 atc310R drag bike
    - 1981 110 chopper.
    - 1985 350X 3+1 durablue axle, uni filter
    - 1985/6 350x
    - 2-84 atc250r's and 1 83
    - 2002 trx400ex
    - 1985 atc 250r
    -1985 atc70 WTB PARTS
    - 1985 tecate

    MADE IT THROUGH TRIKEFEST 04, 05, 06, 07, and 08, cant wait til 09!!

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Jones, Michigan
    --
    1,821

    .

    "Instruction manuals are nothing more than another man's opinion."
    - Chick McGee




    -1985 250sx
    - 1986 atc310R drag bike
    - 1981 110 chopper.
    - 1985 350X 3+1 durablue axle, uni filter
    - 1985/6 350x
    - 2-84 atc250r's and 1 83
    - 2002 trx400ex
    - 1985 atc 250r
    -1985 atc70 WTB PARTS
    - 1985 tecate

    MADE IT THROUGH TRIKEFEST 04, 05, 06, 07, and 08, cant wait til 09!!

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Jones, Michigan
    --
    1,821

    more

    "Instruction manuals are nothing more than another man's opinion."
    - Chick McGee




    -1985 250sx
    - 1986 atc310R drag bike
    - 1981 110 chopper.
    - 1985 350X 3+1 durablue axle, uni filter
    - 1985/6 350x
    - 2-84 atc250r's and 1 83
    - 2002 trx400ex
    - 1985 atc 250r
    -1985 atc70 WTB PARTS
    - 1985 tecate

    MADE IT THROUGH TRIKEFEST 04, 05, 06, 07, and 08, cant wait til 09!!

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Jones, Michigan
    --
    1,821

    last page

    "Instruction manuals are nothing more than another man's opinion."
    - Chick McGee




    -1985 250sx
    - 1986 atc310R drag bike
    - 1981 110 chopper.
    - 1985 350X 3+1 durablue axle, uni filter
    - 1985/6 350x
    - 2-84 atc250r's and 1 83
    - 2002 trx400ex
    - 1985 atc 250r
    -1985 atc70 WTB PARTS
    - 1985 tecate

    MADE IT THROUGH TRIKEFEST 04, 05, 06, 07, and 08, cant wait til 09!!

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Moab, UT
    --
    1,807
    April issue is always a joke!
    ADMIRIN' BOOBS AND BLASTIN' NEWBS

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Moab, UT
    --
    1,807
    Quote Originally Posted by My trike Sucks View Post
    Dude, i work with the things day in and day out, dont preach me on power to weight, 90% of the phazers weight is in the motor itself, theres litertally nothing to the sled, it would still be way to heavy for a quad chassie, hell look at how heavy the banshee still is and its a 350 twin 2 stroke, not to mention, the EFI system on them Blow's goats, theres a reason they only ever put 1 twin in sport quad,
    OK OK, let me straighten something out here. First off, I respect the fact that you work at a dealer. I was a service manager for two years at a YAMAHA dealer and am a certified tech, so i'm giving you some credibility here on what you have to say. However, a snowmobiles crank and flywheel are much heavier to deal with the added strain and the added resistance of turning that huge track, so you can't go by the weight of the motor on this matter. Secondly, the banshees weight problem is actually from the chassis itself, not the motor. Thirdly, the banshee was never intended to be a lightweight racing quad, but a duner and hooligan machine instead. That being said, it is not improbable that yamaha could in fact put a 500 twin 4 stroke in a quad chassis to fill their soon to be missing niche. Who says it has to have 80 horse, they can always detune. Look at yamahas history, they love being controversial. Besides, the consent decree is dead and it's obvious with the machines that the companies are making now. If kawi can have the vforce and everyones 4by4s are having a displacement and power war right now, what's to stop yamaha from making a 4 wheeled bullet? And Banshees don't have fuel injection. Unless you were referring to the sled, in that case, my bad.
    ADMIRIN' BOOBS AND BLASTIN' NEWBS

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    HI
    --
    1,575
    Quote Originally Posted by NINJA View Post
    April issue is always a joke!

    Yeah haha like the 3 cylinder 750cc honda MONSTER from a few years back!



    Rest in peace Rex Carlson

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Clyde Alberta
    --
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by 84honda200s View Post
    agreed for the most part. ive owned about 8 or so sleds the track is probably one of if not the heaviest things on a sled. i only owned 1 yammie sled. it was a snappy little thing for only being a 250. but pretty much i cant comment on yammie sleds at all. i dont know about the phazer engines but the rotax engines and the invader engine i own now only weighed on avg. 70 pounds.


    i do know a rotax wouldnt be to bad in a trike/quad. hell dale put one (i believe a 670 rotax) in his e.t. bike.

    but as i said none of it even matters because they will never ever put a sled engine or a engine as powerful in a quad. but it doesnt mean we cant.

    A rotax is going in the Can-Am DS450, 450X, and maybe newest renegade 800. And the Can-Am's go like greased snot.

//ArrowChat Integreation Code //