Whyzee Those are some killer stockers!!!!!!
![]()
![]()
Whyzee Those are some killer stockers!!!!!!
![]()
![]()
Wikipedia "All Terrain Vehicle" Definition excerpt
Other smaller or lesser known companies, such as Tiger ATV, Franks, and Cagiva, produced racing three wheelers, but in much smaller numbers. Few of these machines are known to exist today and are highly sought by collectors.
Check out my Tiger 3 wheeler Webpage..my quest for a TIGER MUSEUM started 2004 http://sites.google.com/site/tigerrotax/home
Rides: TIGER Factory line up, Tricky Dicks Cagiva 200, 4- Franks 3 and 4 Wheelers
My god are those some beautiful bikes Whyzee! Sounds like a very accurate description to me. I know in working on 86 build and having a friend with a 85, there are many frame differences as well. I agree, they are really very different. But my personal opinion is the 86 is a much better looking bike stock for stock. And like you mentioned, the riding position is much better on the 86 for a taller person. I never really realized all of the changes made between the two years. I have to wonder though, if it's cylinder porting that makes all of the difference, or ignition curves? Or a combo of the two which smoothed out the 86.
36 yo, Apple geek, married with kids, conservative. If you are a GUN OWNER and not a member of the NRA, SHAME ON YOU! JOIN!
Gun control is not about guns, it's about CONTROL!
My Rags
85 ATC70,85 ATC70,85 ATC110,83 ATC185S,85 ATC250ES,02 400EX,04 Polaris ATP 500
Past rags:2000 Scrambler 400, 86 350X, 86 250R, 84 200S, 97 ATK260LQ
The big thing on the 85 motor is the porting.
The 86 has less porting done to it.
My old 1985 250R http://www.flickr.com/photos/24898661@N07/show/
Feedback http://www.3wheelerworldforums.com/s...feed+back+edog
Currently trikeless
You have to remember that honda did a lot of their R&D in the desert (Baja 1000 anyone?). The increased rake for greater high speed stability and taller seat are direct results of testing in that environment.
I've always liked the '86 better even before I moved to the desert. I've never owned a bone stock one though. Motor wise there's hardly anything different about them. I think the most noticable difference you feel (power delivery wise) when riding them comes from the different carb.
I was gonna say that as well. My black "86" was an 85, it still has the 85 carb, shock and forks on it. I really didn't notice much difference between the two, even when they were 85 and 86. Power delivery is mostly the same between all three liquid R's in my houshold.
I am with alot of you guys in liking the 86 better (hence the update on my 85) I like the taller seat, the headlight is brighter and throws a wider beam, the CDI is different, and the rear ends are alot easier to get parts for.
STEALTHDUNER
Trikes I Own
1983 ATC300R (Stealthy)
1986 ATC250R (ESR310)Twin))
1986 ATC250R (Stocker)
1985 ATC200X (Racer X)
1985 ATC350X (Thumper)
1984 ALT50
1986 TRX250R (ESR310 PV)
1988 TRX250R
1997 Yamaha Banshee
2004 TRX450R
Thanks OC. I paid an arm and a leg for the 86 (over 5K), and $1300 for the 85, so I guess it evens out
![]()
Here are some more pics for ya OC. These are from the original owners camera when I bought it. His camera is waaay better than mine.
Check out this motor shot!!!!
And my favorite for telling the true hours on a bike,
I guess my point for this thread was, Alot of people say I want the 86, its newer, its better. Well in my book, I am liking the 85 alot more than the 86. You can find nice 85's on ebay all day long for well under $2k. You are going to spend well above $3k for an 86.
Any newbies here on a budget, or myself now (3 kids) , don't overlook the 1985 250R, it rips.
Last edited by whyzee; 02-24-2008 at 08:48 AM.
you are right on the money. The 85 runs out of speed in mid 5th and mid 6th because of the rpm's. It's like it needs a 7th gear, where the 86 really wakes up and grabs your attention in mid 5th and pulls forever, click it into 6th and you better have alot of real estate, hence the desert testing. Gearing is identical with the 85 and 86 stock.
Makes perfect sense, along with the stability , taller seat, lower footpegs, almost unlimited top end. Direct result of long term testing in the desert.
I was into motocross at that time so I did'nt really follow the 3 wheelers too much.
Wikipedia "All Terrain Vehicle" Definition excerpt
Other smaller or lesser known companies, such as Tiger ATV, Franks, and Cagiva, produced racing three wheelers, but in much smaller numbers. Few of these machines are known to exist today and are highly sought by collectors.
Check out my Tiger 3 wheeler Webpage..my quest for a TIGER MUSEUM started 2004 http://sites.google.com/site/tigerrotax/home
Rides: TIGER Factory line up, Tricky Dicks Cagiva 200, 4- Franks 3 and 4 Wheelers
Last edited by whyzee; 02-24-2008 at 09:00 AM.
I mean just look at the 85.It doesn't even have to be ridden to say it's badazz.![]()
Not a big fan of the seat or the motor color on the 86.
My old 1985 250R http://www.flickr.com/photos/24898661@N07/show/
Feedback http://www.3wheelerworldforums.com/s...feed+back+edog
Currently trikeless
Edog, I have also grown to like the looks of the 85 better except for the painted black motor and shroud decals. The Black motor looks cool but too many people can find Krylon Black, lol
I love the way it sits lower, but the stock Dunlops do suck compared to the Ohtsu's in the overall handling.
It's funny, I used to love the look of the 86's and wasn't a big fan of the 85's......but then again I see some brunettes that blow me away![]()
Yeah mine revs forever out in the dunes. It's not stock though. It's got great power for a 250 through the whole powerband actually. The delivery is nice and smooth and not like a light switch either which is nice.
You should swap carbs on them and do another test ride. It would be interesting to see the results since that's the most obvious change between them. Supposedly the squish is a little different with the 85 having a bit more compression than the 86 but I've never seen any numbers to back that up. My 86 has a lot more compression than my 85 did (again though, neither were stock). The only other thing that could explain the difference would have to be something in the ignition. As far as I've ever read there's no difference in stock porting.
As far as newbies choosing one, get whichever one you find the best deal on. We're splitting hairs here. They're both awesome bikes and the differences are pretty subtle in reality. Anything one might do slightly better than the other is easily adapted with mods.
Well, I have read the entire post here and say it is quite impressive. Some killer R's there guys. I call mine an 85 and a half. A friend had his 86 stole years ago and gave it to me with out an engine, just a roller. I was thinking of doing mine over as it's been quite a few years now and the frame needs new paint cause it's dull now.
Current set up
86 Frame and Forks
85 Motor, carb and electronics
85 Swing arm mod done to use the 86 brakes
85 bearing carrier
86 rear axle and sprockets.
85 Seat love it compared to the 86 I'm 5'10"
I was thinking restore it back to an 85 or 86 by faking the paint on the engine but after this read I think I'm happy calling it an 85 and 1/2