Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: best year for the trx250r???

  1. #1
    Ryan. is offline At The Back Of The Pack Arm chair racerAt the back of the pack
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Michigan
    --
    317

    best year for the trx250r???

    whats the best year for a trx250r, being reliability and power wise


    thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Lipetsk, Russia
    --
    2,824
    88-89, is what I've heard.

  3. #3
    Ryan. is offline At The Back Of The Pack Arm chair racerAt the back of the pack
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Michigan
    --
    317
    Quote Originally Posted by RedRider_AK View Post
    88-89, is what I've heard.
    ok thanks, because im thinking about getting one

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    overton, PA
    --
    5,257
    the power is pretty much the same
    but the majow diffrences are the aluminum swingarm on the 88-89 compared to the steel one of the 86-07 and then the frames were weaker in 86 but not shur eabotu i have had manu i have raced over the years but i havent felt much diffrence of anyog them.
    ok here goes, 85 atc70,2 84 atc70's 83 alt50,83 atc110 , 70 us 90 parot green, 85/86 350x garage queen, stock rider 85 350x, project 85 350x 85 250r drag bike, 2 85 250sx's, alt185, , scat tracker?99blaster,85 250r rider,85 250r ice racer project ,93 kx500,99 xr200r, 91 dr250s ,89 lt500 quadzilla,88 lt250quadracer, 88 trx250r race full on race quad,, 01 yamahakodiak400, kawaki kd100,lt50 for my doughters,93 300ex, 230 quadsport, lt185, lt250 quadrunner,84200s, is that enough?

  5. #5
    Ryan. is offline At The Back Of The Pack Arm chair racerAt the back of the pack
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Michigan
    --
    317
    Quote Originally Posted by brapp View Post
    the power is pretty much the same
    but the majow diffrences are the aluminum swingarm on the 88-89 compared to the steel one of the 86-07 and then the frames were weaker in 86 but not shur eabotu i have had manu i have raced over the years but i havent felt much diffrence of anyog them.
    how about reliability wise?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Victor NY
    --
    538
    atv of the century......you wont be sorry...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Pyeongtaek, South Korea
    --
    474
    The 86-87 250R is just as reliable as the 88-89 versions. A lot of people just look for the 88-89s because they look a little better and handle slightly better. My buddy and I know a woman from Nebraska who swears by the 86, and she always has really nice ones. As a matter of fact, hers were in a package deal on Ebay this week. How she finds what she does is beyond me, but she's good at it.

    As differences go, the 86-87 does have a slightly weaker chassis, but unless you pound the tar out of them, you won't notice. They tend to crack around the footpegs more than the 88-89. For 88, Honda shortened the swingarm by 1" and made it from aluminum to reduce the unsprung weight. They also revised the front suspension geometry a little to help eliminate bump steer. You'd have to ride an early and late 250R back-to-back to really pick up on the differences. What ever model you end up with, you can't go wrong with a 250R.
    Operation Iraqi Freedom V and Operation Enduring Freedom X veteran

    The Constitution and Bill of Rights were written in common English for the common man. There is no interpretation necessary.

    "To err is human, to err continuously is liberal." - Me

  8. #8
    Ryan. is offline At The Back Of The Pack Arm chair racerAt the back of the pack
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Michigan
    --
    317
    Quote Originally Posted by 69HemiGTX View Post
    The 86-87 250R is just as reliable as the 88-89 versions. A lot of people just look for the 88-89s because they look a little better and handle slightly better. My buddy and I know a woman from Nebraska who swears by the 86, and she always has really nice ones. As a matter of fact, hers were in a package deal on Ebay this week. How she finds what she does is beyond me, but she's good at it.

    As differences go, the 86-87 does have a slightly weaker chassis, but unless you pound the tar out of them, you won't notice. They tend to crack around the footpegs more than the 88-89. For 88, Honda shortened the swingarm by 1" and made it from aluminum to reduce the unsprung weight. They also revised the front suspension geometry a little to help eliminate bump steer. You'd have to ride an early and late 250R back-to-back to really pick up on the differences. What ever model you end up with, you can't go wrong with a 250R.

    ok thanks, that helped alot

  9. #9
    300rman's Avatar
    300rman is offline My other user 3WW ID was Nitebiker07. Teaching quads a lesson
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    toledo
    --
    2,667
    i just dont understand why they didnt carry the 250r quad till the death of 2 strokes last year......

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    englishtown NJ
    --
    2,676
    the 250r stopped in 89 due to forseen epa 2 stroke emissions(didn't happen untill 08) and the general drop is sales for all sport atv's. Honda wasn't gonna make a 89, but decided to. Many 88 and 89's sat in dealer showrooms unopened and as models untill the mid 90's. With this in mind, now why would honda continue to sell an atv that the pervouis 2 years are still in showroom floors? The sport atv market was dead untill the late 90's. Suzuki stopped the lt's due to declining/no sales, kawisaki ended it in 88 for the same reason. Yamaha still kept the banshee, it must have been a big enough seller to keep.

//ArrowChat Integreation Code //