im looking for a fast but reliable quad which is beter
Awesome as a 5 legged opossum!
Its alright, nothing really special
I don't like it
I'd rather write messages on a napkin and mail them back and fourth.
Yes
No
Undecided
yamaha kodiak 450
honda foreman 450s
yamaha warrier
yamaha banshee
First Time Rider
Arm chair racerNew to the board
im looking for a fast but reliable quad which is beter
Got The Holeshot
Arm chair racerJust too addicted
I wouldn't consider the Warrior fast, but it is reliable. Go with a 250X or 300Ex, and modify them to make very fast machines, or the 400EX and LTZ-400 are also good reliable pretty quick quads.
1986 ATC 250R(for sale), 1963 AceCraft boat w/40HP Evinrude, 1981 Arctic Cat El Tigre' 440 L/C, 1992 GMC Safari Van.
Within Arms Reach Of The Master
Arm chair racerLord of the trike
That's kinda of a bad question. Those two machines are completely different. Your comparing a 350 4-stroke, electric start and reverse to a 350 2-stroke, kick start with no reverse. Do you know what are you looking for?
'02 Honda 416ex - A seasoned blend of 11 herbs and spices
'04 Honda Recon - The yard machine and snow plow
'88 Honda CR250R - Another chapter in my torrid all terrain affair
Power User
Lord of the trike
If you are going to race with them go with the Banshee. If you live near the woods and ride there a lot then go with the warrior. if you want one just to putt around get the warrior. The banshee was built mainly for high performance racing and very fast riding and the warrior built for pretty much everything else (the lesser extremes of racing, woods, slow riding, etc...)
[20:55] <waterpumper> putting a racing pipe on a Foreman is like putting a high dollar bikini on a 400 pound chick...just because it fits doesn't mean it looks cool
First Time Rider
Arm chair racerNew to the board
yes i know what im looking for. but i am planing on racing and the reason why i put this up is becaus my friend has a warrior and he thinks that it can smoke a banshee! and i whant to know trailprotrailpro opinion.
Banned
The day begins with 3WW
He will smoke a Banshee if his rings are bad, and he is upwind.
Because you are asking this question, I would recommend the Warrior of the two. Its easier to master for less experienced riders, which I would assume you are one. Though its not up to par with some of the newer designs now available, they are still quite fast, and reasonably priced.
im not a new rider. but im new to riding four wheelers. i usully ride three wheelers.
At The Back Of The Pack
Arm chair racerAt the back of the pack
I see many of you voted on the banshee, and my guess is because of the name. The warrior is a better bike than the banshee, for most people and areas. Not everybody has Glamis in their back yard. I mean you have to think of the probability's of what the bike is going to be used for. Banshee's aren't even good for the race track. The one and only place for a banshee is the sand, and they are no where near as reliable as a WQarrior as well.
ATC350X,ATC70,1991 RM 250,XR500,TM400,TS400,Foreman400 4X4,Polaris 425 Magnum,ATC 90, 1982 175,1973 Honda Trail 90,1980 CR80,1981 CR80,
Within Arms Reach Of The Master
Arm chair racerLord of the trike
The both stink for the track. They both stink for racing in general without serious modification. Serious Modifications. What kind of racing are you thinking?
Your buddy could have his warrior punched out, camed, piped, carbed, and blessed and it still won't smoke a banshee.
stick to 3wheelers both those macines suck arse
Ill agree that if your going to race on a track, like a motocross track neither one is the best choice. But if you talking about the woods stick with the warrier. It has to be the most reliable quad ever made. And what ever you do!DoNT get a 300 or 250EX. only if you want to sleep while riding your quad!!
New to the board
Arm chair racerNew to the board
I never said my warrior could smoke a banshee.you'r crazy a banshee is way faster than a warrior!!!
First Time Rider
Arm chair racerNew to the board
yes u did u told me that u could smoke it when we were in logan :!: :!: :!:
Reply With Quote