Warrior Vs. Blaster

[smokinwrench]

I think a blaster is one of the funest quads to ride. It is so small and manuuverable you can really throw the trailprotrailprotrailprotrailprotrailpro end around and roost all day long with it. I havnet ridden one in about 2 years though.

[J.D.]

Actually I think a Blaster would win a drag too. If I remember correctly Blaster has 17 HP and a Warrior has 18, and I am sure a Blaster is a LOT lighter than a Warrior. Top speed, a warrior is probably geared higher for more speed. Later.

[TimSr]

well BANSHEE350 you need to get your chit straight. i agree with all of th people on this thread about you. i am pretty new and dont have alot of posts to this forum but i can sure tell you that you dont know anything. and by the way, if you ever rode a blaster with some stuff done to it, they can be really fun and like sone of the people said, they may not be the fastest but there sure not the slowest, and i bet they would beat that banshee you dont even have. lol

I think that before you advise somebody to get their "chit" straight, you might want to look at the date of the posting and realize that you are replying to a two year old post, which leaves enough time for the guy to have earned an AA degree in mechanical engineering between the time he posted and the time you replied.

[ATC crazy]

Hahahaha....Tim, I didnt realize that it was 2 years old until you said something about it.

[threewheelin-feelin]

a 200s is a small slow bike but i have fun on it come to think of it it really ant that slow. but i dont put other ppls trailprotrailprotrailprotrailpro down in less im playing around with them.

[honda200]

I have an 87 warrior and i race a 300 EX (my bors) and his is about the same speed as a blaster, in 5th gear i just barely pass him, but once i hit 6th then i dont really pass him fast, but more then a crawl, this is straight in about 1/4 mile long field

Curtis

[everydaycajun01]

easy,kids will be kids

[lisnup65]

I have a 2000 Warrior and a 2003 Blaster. In stock form the warrior will take the Blaster on top end. I now run Blue Marble oil in the Blaster and I changed the front sprocker by a tooth. The Warrior eats the Blaster out of the hole with this setup, but in about 4/500 feet the Blaster walks right by it.

The Blaster in theory should be quicker than the Warrior as its smaller, lighter, about equal in ponies. The difference is the gearing!!! The blaster 1st 2 gears are useless because its attempting to make up for the lack of torque. These are just my observations of running both machines.

Both machines serve a purpose and both are a fine ride. If I were to race, I would take the smaller, lighter and more nimble Blaster any day as the warrior just is not a race machine. Its the first cross between a utility and a sport machine.