Last edited by big specht; 04-27-2016 at 05:52 AM.
If its on the internet its got to be true they can't put any lie's on the internet
to short or the different angle or both?
Email- onformula1@hotmail.com Rebuilt, Revalved, custom springs, lowering, forks & shocks, Custom Suspension, all brands, 2-3-4 wheeler's- PM or Email with questions.
***Check out my album for cool pictures*** http://www.3wheelerworld.com/album.php?albumid=2527
As always- Everything I post is IMHO.
When I first switched to a pro-x cylinder on my atc I used a spacer and atc/trx intake and it was very tight, but worked. I switched to a cr250r rad valve and it was better distance wise, but the angle was a little off. The biggest pain I had was fitting the air tube over the back of my 39mm pwk. I now run a 39mm UPP intake with a cr250 reed cage without spacer, and air box eliminator and have no issues.
'86 ATC 250R, Build Thread http://www.3wheelerworld.com/showthr...highlight=250r
'86 "Factory Tri racing" Tri-Z http://www.3wheelerworld.com/showthr...b-Top-Tank-ect
Pile of Tecate Parts
My Feedback Thread: http://www.3wheelerworld.com/showthr...edback-for-bkm
i once got a motor with a compound angle cut spacer to offset the angle of using a cr250 intake boot.
simple solution was to ditch the spacer and the cr boot.
warm a good pliable trx intake boot to fit a pwk in, and everything lines up.
the molds seem to have gone to crap on the upp intakes. ive had multiple ones and they were all very thick on one side of the boot and the material on the other side is very thin.